Share this article
DeFi Borrower Behavior Key to Gauging Tokenization Risks: BIS Study
The study was designed to look at the largely unexplored "intricacies" of user behavior and dynamics of decentralized finance lending, the authors said.
Updated Mar 14, 2024, 10:46 a.m. Published Mar 14, 2024, 10:44 a.m.
Make us preferred on Google
- The behaviour of borrowers in decentralized finance (DeFi) is important in considering the design of collateralized borrowing platforms with emerging tokenized assets, a BIS study has found.
- The study's authors claim to be the first to document individual DeFi wallets’ leverage, relevant to understanding financial stability concerns.
The behaviors of borrowers in the decentralized finance space and DeFi market dynamics are important considerations when designing and managing platforms involving tokenized assets, a study by the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) has concluded.
Financial institutions worldwide are increasingly experimenting with tokenizing traditional assets such as bonds and securities. The workings of DeFi lending platforms offer useful insight into the risks associated with tokenization and the potential disruption of traditional finance, the technical study by the central bank group said.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
The study concluded that since DeFi borrowers face substantial losses upon automatic liquidation – where collateral is automatically sold when borrowers' positions get too risky – they generally avoid leveraging too much. The borrowers take a conservative approach with a sizeable buffer. Additionally, DeFi users tend to deposit more if they have higher past returns.
The study's authors, Lioba Heimbach and Wenqian Huang, claim to be the first to document individual DeFi wallets’ leverage. Their findings could potentially be relevant to understanding financial stability concerns emanating from DeFi, Heimbach and Huang wrote.
They conducted the study using data from the Ethereum blockchain, focusing on lending resilience and strategic substitution behavior.
The BIS has been exploring the DeFi space for some time now. In 2023, the BIS said it worked with the central banks of France, Singapore and Switzerland to successfully test cross-border trading of wholesale central bank digital currencies and DeFi elements – specifically automated market makers. In 2022, two BIS papers said that DeFi could lead to bumpier financial markets and may not fix the problem of large intermediaries dominating.
This latest study was conducted between January 2021 and March 2023 to specifically look at the largely unexplored "intricacies of user behavior and pool dynamics within DeFi lending." The importance of conducting the study was based on the recognition that DeFi protocols have been facilitating collateralized borrowing on an "economically significant scale" with highs of over $35 billion in deposits and $25 billion in outstanding debt, the study said.
Read More: Central Banks Successfully Test Cross Border Trading of Wholesale CBDC Using DeFi
More For You
KuCoin captured a record share of centralised exchange volume in 2025, with more than $1.25tn traded as its volumes grew faster than the wider crypto market.
What to know:
- KuCoin recorded over $1.25 trillion in total trading volume in 2025, equivalent to an average of roughly $114 billion per month, marking its strongest year on record.
- This performance translated into an all-time high share of centralised exchange volume, as KuCoin’s activity expanded faster than aggregate CEX volumes, which slowed during periods of lower market volatility.
- Spot and derivatives volumes were evenly split, each exceeding $500 billion for the year, signalling broad-based usage rather than reliance on a single product line.
- Altcoins accounted for the majority of trading activity, reinforcing KuCoin’s role as a primary liquidity venue beyond BTC and ETH at a time when majors saw more muted turnover.
- Even as overall crypto volumes softened mid-year, KuCoin maintained elevated baseline activity, indicating structurally higher user engagement rather than short-lived volume spikes.
More For You
Ukraine banned Polymarket and there’s no legal way for it to come back
Polymarket and similar platforms are considered unlicensed gambling operators, leading to blocked access.
What to know:
- Ukraine has no legal framework for Web3 prediction markets, and current legislation provides no recognition for such platforms.
- Polymarket and similar platforms are considered unlicensed gambling operators, leading to blocked access.
- Legal changes are unlikely in the near future, as Parliamentary revisions to gambling definitions are extremely improbable during wartime, leaving prediction markets in a legal deadlock.
Top Stories
