Share this article

Binance ‘De-Platforms’ Russian OTC Firm Suex That Was Sanctioned by US

The service had been using Binance and Huobi to trade cryptocurrency on behalf of its clients, blockchain analysis shows.

Updated May 11, 2023, 4:13 p.m. Published Sep 23, 2021, 6:01 p.m.
(Pixabay, modified by CoinDesk)

Binance CEO Changpeng “CZ” Zhao said that earlier this year the world’s biggest crypto exchange deactivated accounts associated with Suex, which was designated as a money laundering vehicle by the Office of Assets Control (OFAC) on Tuesday.

The U.S. government blacklisted 25 blockchain addresses for bitcoin, ether and tether that the regulator said Russia-based Suex used for its operations.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the Crypto Daybook Americas Newsletter today. See all newsletters

“We de-platformed these accounts based on internal safeguards,” Zhao said in a blog post on Wednesday. “Information regarding the addresses in the announcement, as well as other information from our internal investigation was shared with the appropriate authorities and we continue to collaborate with law enforcement to cast sunlight on those threat actors that seek to abuse our platforms, such as Suex.”

jwp-player-placeholder

Some of the addresses listed by OFAC were last active in 2019 or 2020, but some were used as recently as August. Binance didn’t immediately respond to questions about when it deactivated the accouts.

Earlier, crypto sleuthing firm Chainalysis said it helped OFAC identify the Suex’s crypto wallets, adding that the OTC firm helped launder money coming from major scams, hacker groups and drug traffickers. Elliptic, another blockchain analytics firm, wrote in a blog post the addresses received about $934 million worth of crypto in total.

Particular pattern of use

Analysis of the 25 addresses listed by the OFAC shows all but two are exchange deposit addresses that had apparently been used by Suex to buy and sell crypto on behalf of its clients.

The addresses have a particular pattern of use: Identical amounts of crypto hit the addresses and leave immediately without accumulating or getting split. That most often indicates an address designated by an exchange for users to deposit money. Crypto flows from such wallets to the exchange’s hot wallets. The pattern can be seen, for example, on this BTC address, ETH address and USDT address.

Further research on the addresses indicated that most belong to two exchanges: Binance and Huobi. When contacted, Huobi declined to comment on whether the listed addresses belonged to it.

It’s also possible that Suex used other addresses, which OFAC has yet to identify, Elliptic co-founder Tom Robinson told CoinDesk by email.

According to Chainalysis, Suex processed almost $13 million of crypto from ransomware operators, including Conti, Maze, Ryuk and others; over $24 million from scams, including Finiko, a major crypto Ponzi scheme that operated in Russia and Ukraine; more than $20 million from darknet markets, especially the Russia-based Hydra; and over $50 million from BTC-e, the now-defunct crypto exchange whose alleged operator, Alexander Vinnik, recently went to jail for money laundering in France.

The Finiko scam heavily relied on Suex’s services, said Scott Pounder, head of investigations at the blockchain analytics firm Crystal Blockchain.

“We noticed that most of the USDC fund flows, $11.5 million out of $14 million, came directly from the Finiko Ponzi scheme, more than $9 million in bitcoin came from Finiko, as well as $2.7 million in ERC20 tether,” Pounder said. “Over $155 million of the overall flow of more than $930 million funds received by Suex OTC could be deemed as high risk,” he added.

Suex founder Egor Petukhovsky declined to comment by press time.

UPDATE (SEPT. 23, 12:13 UTC) Adds Huobi declined to comment in the eighth paragraph.

UPDATE (SEPT. 23, 12:45 UTC) Adds details from Chainalysis research, quote from Crystal Blockchain in last four paragraphs.

Más para ti

State of the Blockchain 2025

State of the Blockchain 16:9

L1 tokens broadly underperformed in 2025 despite a backdrop of regulatory and institutional wins. Explore the key trends defining ten major blockchains below.

Lo que debes saber:

2025 was defined by a stark divergence: structural progress collided with stagnant price action. Institutional milestones were reached and TVL increased across most major ecosystems, yet the majority of large-cap Layer-1 tokens finished the year with negative or flat returns.

This report analyzes the structural decoupling between network usage and token performance. We examine 10 major blockchain ecosystems, exploring protocol versus application revenues, key ecosystem narratives, mechanics driving institutional adoption, and the trends to watch as we head into 2026.

Más para ti

Tensions over El Salvador's bitcoin holdings ease as IMF praises economic progress

The National Palace in San Salvador, El Salvador.

The Central American country’s economy is projected to grow 4% this year, the IMF said.

Lo que debes saber:

  • The IMF praised El Salvador's stronger-than-expected economic growth and progress in bitcoin-related discussions.
  • El Salvador's real GDP growth is projected to reach around 4%, with a positive outlook for 2026.
  • Despite previous IMF recommendations, El Salvador continues to increase its bitcoin holdings, adding over 1,000 BTC during November's market downturn.