Rabby Wallet vs MetaMask: Which EVM Wallet Fits You?

Choosing between Rabby and MetaMask comes down to how you use your wallet. Rabby pairs lower in-wallet swap fees with EVM-focused tools. MetaMask brings Bitcoin and Solana alongside EVM accounts. Here’s how their fees, signing controls and recovery options compare.

Written by
Andrej Gjorgievski Contributing Author

Rabby Wallet

Runner-up

Rabby is an EVM wallet with transaction previews, portfolio tracking and a 0.25% standard swap fee. It supports hardware connections but not native Bitcoin or Solana accounts.

MetaMask

Overall winner

MetaMask combines EVM dApp access with native Bitcoin, Solana and TRON accounts. It offers hardware connections and optional linked-login recovery, with a 0.875% wallet swap fee.

Affiliate Disclosure

Some links in this comparison are affiliate links. CryptoSlate may earn a commission if you sign up through these links. Our ratings remain editorially independent.

Overview

Both wallets support self-custody and hardware signing. The table separates shared capabilities from differences in network coverage, fees and device support.

Rabby Wallet MetaMask
Product Scope
EVM-focused extension, mobile and desktop apps
Extension and mobile apps with EVM and native non-EVM accounts
Key Control
Software-held keys or connected hardware signer
Software-held keys or connected hardware signer
Recovery
Phrase/private key, plus optional encrypted mobile cloud backup
Phrase, plus linked-login/password recovery for social accounts
Signing Preview
Expected balance changes and bypassable risk warnings
Estimated balance changes and bypassable security alerts
EVM Networks
Integrated networks and custom EVM networks with fewer features
Supported EVM networks and custom network/RPC settings
Native Non-EVM Accounts
No native Bitcoin, Solana or TRON
Native Bitcoin, Solana and TRON
Platforms
Chrome, Brave, Edge, iOS, Android, macOS and Windows clients
Chrome, Firefox, Brave, Edge, iOS and Android clients
Wallet Swap Fee
0.25%, with eligible same-chain fee exemptions
0.875%, separate from network costs
Extension License
MIT terms with Rabby branding reserved
Custom license with non-commercial-use restrictions
Hardware Examples
Extension Ledger/Trezor, mobile Ledger/Trezor via Bluetooth
Extension Ledger/Trezor, mobile Ledger/Keystone/NGRAVE ZERO
MetaMask wins overview

Comparison scope: Rabby Wallet extension/mobile and desktop distribution versus MetaMask extension/mobile. Specifications verified September 11, 2026. Documentation-based comparison, no hands-on app, hardware, accessibility or transaction tests.

Start with the accounts and devices you need. Native assets, custom networks and hardware connections are separate checks: support for one does not guarantee support for the others. The sections below explain those limits before comparing signing, recovery and costs.

Screenshots

Winners By Category

Rabby leads on the wallet swap fee. MetaMask leads on native-chain coverage. Shared EVM access is a tie. The other results below distinguish comparable features from areas without enough evidence to name a winner.

Rabby Wallet MetaMask
Custody And Key Control

Both support owner-controlled software accounts and separate hardware signers. Optional online backups do not change where ordinary transactions are signed.

12-word phrase or imported keys, optional encrypted iCloud or Google Drive file on mobile
Phrase or imported keys, social accounts decrypt an encrypted backend phrase locally
Security And Transaction Signing

Both preview supported requests and issue warnings. Different audit scopes and historical incidents do not establish better current scam detection.

Expected balance changes and bypassable warnings, 2025 Least Authority reports, 2022 Swap contract attack
Default-on alerts and balance estimates, 2023 Snaps audit, 2022 Demonic disclosure mitigated in 10.11.3
Recovery And Backup

Rabby's mobile cloud file and MetaMask's linked-login recovery require different credentials and services. Both retain owner-held phrase alternatives.

Phrase or private key, mobile cloud file needs its original backup password
Phrase, or linked login plus wallet password, extension passkey unlocks locally only
Shared EVM Access

Both support EVM dApps and custom networks. Integrated features and custom-network limitations differ by app.

Integrated EVM chains with portfolio and simulation tools, custom EVM networks with fewer features
Supported EVM networks and custom RPC settings
Platforms, Hardware, And Daily Use

Rabby offers native desktop clients. MetaMask supports Firefox. Mobile signer lists differ, making the intended app and hardware connection decisive.

Chrome, Brave, Edge, iOS, Android, macOS and Windows, Ledger and Trezor over mobile Bluetooth
Chrome, Firefox, Brave, Edge, iOS and Android, Ledger, Keystone and NGRAVE ZERO on mobile
Wallet Swap Fees

For frequent in-wallet EVM swaps, Rabby's standard wallet fee is lower. Final received amounts still depend on routes, liquidity and gas.

0.25% wallet swap fee, with eligible same-chain exemptions
0.875% wallet swap fee, separate from network costs
Privacy And Data Collection

Both expose information through network and optional services. Policy wording and available switches do not measure comparative data collection.

Policy lists contact, device, usage and IP data, optional cloud backup
Analytics opt-in for phrase setups, Segment and Mixpanel, security alerts share request data
Updates, Longevity, And Ecosystem

Both publish client development records. Component licenses and backups affect migration, but neither establishes a longer future support life.

Public extension, mobile and desktop repositories, MIT extension license with brand reserved
Public repositories under restrictive licenses, extension 13.47.1 on September 10, 2026
Native Chain Coverage

MetaMask covers more native networks. This is an asset-coverage advantage, not evidence of better EVM signing or security.

EVM networks only. No native Bitcoin, Solana or TRON accounts.
EVM networks plus native Bitcoin, Solana and TRON accounts

A fee advantage is not a staking or safety win. These category results describe specific uses, rather than votes toward the overall review score.

Custody And Key Control

Phrase-created accounts in either app hold signing credentials in software. Connected hardware accounts instead keep private keys on the separate signer. Check the account type protecting each balance.

Rabby Wallet MetaMask
Software Accounts
Owner-held phrase or imported private keys
Owner-held phrase or imported private keys
Hardware Accounts
Keys remain on the connected signer
Keys remain on the connected signer
Tie

Both provide owner-controlled software accounts and hardware-account connections for EVM use. Choose the account's signing method deliberately, because an optional cloud backup is not a hardware signer.

Local Accounts And Online Backups

Rabby creates a 12-word phrase or imports existing phrases and private keys. Its local password protects that installation, with optional biometric access on mobile. MetaMask also offers phrase-based creation and private-key imports. Neither local password makes a copied recovery phrase unusable elsewhere.

Optional online backup is separate from base signing. Rabby Mobile can put a password-encrypted backup file in your iCloud or Google Drive storage. MetaMask social-login accounts store an encrypted phrase on its backend. The phrase is decrypted on the client after the required authentication, not held as plaintext fragments by the login provider.

Hardware Accounts And Portability

Hardware accounts retain their own backups. Importing a hardware phrase into an app exposes that secret to software and is not hardware pairing.

An EVM address can appear in both interfaces without an onchain transfer if both use the same key. Compromising that key compromises the address in both apps. Separate phrases are needed when the purpose is to separate funds and credentials.

Security And Transaction Signing

Both preview supported requests and issue warnings. Different audit scopes and historical incidents do not establish better current scam detection.

Rabby Wallet MetaMask
Transaction Previews
Expected token changes and bypassable risk warnings
Estimated balance changes and bypassable alerts
Audit Scope
Separate extension and mobile changes audited in 2025
Snaps integration audited in 2023
No clear winner

For EVM signing, both provide warnings and support separate hardware approval. Their differently scoped audits and incidents do not establish which current app catches more malicious requests, so neither earns a general safety claim.

Rabby's signing screen describes expected token changes and flags risks such as unfamiliar contracts, suspicious tokens and problematic approvals. MetaMask also estimates balance changes and supplies security alerts. Neither preview promises that execution will match the estimate or that an unflagged request is harmless.

Signing And Approval Controls

Rabby can disable its Sign button after a warning, but Ignore All lets the user proceed. Its EVM transaction and approval controls distinguish disconnecting a dApp from revoking token-spending permission. Revocation requires an onchain transaction. Its optional extension whitelist password check is local and can be bypassed using the seed in another app.

On both MetaMask clients, security alerts start enabled. Supported EVM requests go to MetaMask servers for analysis, while supported non-EVM requests go to Blockaid. Users can override a warning. Rabby's simulation guide describes its output and warnings but does not identify the processing location.

Code, Audits, And Historical Incidents

Least Authority's September 2, 2025 Rabby reports cover separate extension and mobile changes. At the audited revisions, medium-severity findings involving extension QR-sync eavesdropping and mobile password-key derivation remained unresolved. Both require access to encrypted material and successful password cracking. These report-date findings do not diagnose today's store builds.

MetaMask components have also been independently assessed. Least Authority's September 2023 audit covered Snaps integration with the extension, not every current client or third-party Snap. Counting reports would compare different code scopes and dates.

In October 2022, Rabby disclosed an attack on its Swap contract and urged approval revocation. Neptune Mutual's technical analysis and Revoke.cash associate roughly $200,000 in losses with that exposure. MetaMask's 2022 Demonic issue instead concerned recovery material potentially left on disk under specific extension-use conditions. Halborn disclosed it, and MetaMask identified version 10.11.3 mitigations. Contract approvals and local secret exposure are different failure modes.

Rabby publishes a bug-bounty contact, while MetaMask routes vulnerability reports through HackerOne.

Recovery And Backup

Rabby's optional mobile backup recovers access from a cloud file using its original backup password, while MetaMask social accounts require the linked identity and wallet password.

Rabby Wallet MetaMask
Optional Online Recovery
Mobile cloud file plus its original backup password
Linked identity plus the social account's wallet password
Phrase Alternative
Owner-held recovery material
Owner-held recovery material; social users can export their phrase
No clear winner

Rabby's mobile file backup fits someone retaining cloud access and the backup password, while MetaMask's social route fits someone retaining linked-login credentials. Both offer phrase-based alternatives, so the choice is which recovery dependencies the owner can maintain.

Cloud Files And Linked Logins

Rabby Mobile offers manual phrase backup or an encrypted iCloud/Google Drive file. Cloud restoration requires access to that backup and the password used when it was created. A later installation password is not a substitute, and Rabby cannot retrieve the missing backup password.

Google and Apple are MetaMask setup options. Telegram creation is restricted to its extension. Recovery needs the account's password as well as access through the linked identity and backup services. Export the Secret Recovery Phrase if you want an alternative that does not depend on those services.

MetaMask extension passkeys instead provide local access to a phrase-based installation. They cannot restore another installation and are unavailable for social-login accounts.

Restoring access cannot make an exposed phrase secret again. If someone else controls it, move remaining assets to newly secured accounts instead of reinstalling the compromised wallet.

Restoring The Expected Accounts

Both import owner-held EVM recovery material, but check the resulting addresses. MetaMask documents its Ethereum import derivation path, and Rabby's hardware connection settings include account-path selection. Discovery paths or account indices can make an expected address initially appear missing.

Separately imported private keys need their own backups. Hardware accounts must be reconnected using the device's recovery process if necessary. Restoring a MetaMask phrase in Rabby does not add native Bitcoin or Solana support to Rabby.

Networks, Assets, And dApp Access

Rabby automatically selects the supported network requested by a dApp and aggregates integrated-chain portfolios. MetaMask provides EVM network settings and custom RPC endpoints alongside native non-EVM accounts.

Rabby Wallet MetaMask
EVM Access
Integrated EVM tools and basic custom-network access
Supported EVM networks and custom RPC settings
Native Bitcoin And Solana
Not supported natively
Native accounts available

Shared EVM access is a tie. Native-chain coverage favors MetaMask. Rabby’s custom networks have fewer features than its integrated chains. Broader network support does not establish better signing protection.

Integrated And Custom EVM Networks

Rabby's integrated chains support portfolio data, simulation and approval tools. Its custom-network option accommodates EVM networks and testnets with fewer features. A custom entry supports basic balances, transfers and dApp connections without promising all the integrated services.

Rabby's extension source implements per-chain custom RPC controls. Check mobile separately before relying on the same controls there. MetaMask documents custom EVM networks and editable RPC URLs on extension and mobile. Its network settings do not automatically synchronize across installations.

Choosing a custom MetaMask RPC can disable Smart Transactions on Ethereum, Linea, Base, Arbitrum and BNB Smart Chain. Check the intended feature after changing the network configuration.

dApps And Non-EVM Accounts

Rabby's extension supplies an injected provider, and its mobile app has an in-app dApp browser. MetaMask also connects through its extension and mobile browser, with compatible applications offering remote mobile connections. A QR code is not by itself proof of WalletConnect support, and the dApp determines which connection choices it presents.

MetaMask's native Bitcoin, Solana and TRON accounts handle those networks without relying only on EVM representations of their assets. Rabby excludes those native networks. MetaMask announced TRON dApp support on September 10, 2026, although its help-center FAQ still contradicted that announcement on September 11. Confirm the intended TRON connection before relying on it.

Platforms, Hardware, And Daily Use

Rabby offers native desktop clients. MetaMask supports Firefox. Mobile signer lists differ, making the intended app and hardware connection decisive.

Rabby Wallet MetaMask
Desktop And Browser
Native macOS/Windows clients; Chrome, Brave and Edge
Chrome, Firefox, Brave and Edge
Mobile Hardware Examples
Ledger/Trezor over Bluetooth, Keystone and OneKey
Ledger, Keystone and NGRAVE ZERO
No clear winner

Choose around your actual setup: a native desktop client, Firefox, or a particular hardware connection. Check the model and transport requirements, including MetaMask’s Ledger–Firefox limitation, before pairing.

Rabby distributes Chrome, Brave and Edge extensions, iOS and Android apps, and macOS and Windows desktop clients. MetaMask's installation guide covers Chrome, Firefox, Brave and Edge plus iOS and Android. Availability does not mean every client has identical backup, signer or transaction features.

Hardware And Account Management

Rabby lists Ledger, Trezor and GridPlus among its extension integrations. Its mobile list includes Ledger and Trezor over Bluetooth, plus Keystone and OneKey. Its Ledger guide specifies USB with the Ethereum app for the extension. These are brand-level lists. Check your model's supported transport before pairing.

MetaMask's extension hardware options include Ledger, Trezor and Lattice signers among other supported devices. MetaMask Mobile lists NGRAVE ZERO alongside Ledger and Keystone. The Ledger integration is EVM-only despite the app's native Bitcoin and Solana accounts. MetaMask also warns about Ledger connection problems with Firefox 112 and later.

Rabby can synchronize extension accounts to mobile by QR. Retain their backups before removing the original installation. MetaMask network settings require separate attention because restoring accounts does not synchronize custom-network configuration.

Support And Accessibility

Rabby's primary technical-support channel is Help Center chat. Email is an alternative, and Discord hosts community discussion. MetaMask starts chat with its bot and offers human assistance when available. Neither channel should receive a recovery phrase or private key. MetaMask has no support phone line, and Rabby says it has no Telegram support.

Guaranteed support response times are Not disclosed.

Swaps, Staking, And Costs

For frequent in-wallet EVM swaps, Rabby's standard wallet fee is lower. Final received amounts still depend on routes, liquidity and gas.

Rabby Wallet MetaMask
Standard Wallet Swap Fee
0.25%, with eligible same-chain exemptions
0.875%, separate from network costs
Final Swap Quote
Route, liquidity, price impact and gas still affect output
Route, liquidity, price impact and gas still affect output

Rabby wins on the wallet swap fee, not on staking or guaranteed execution price. Compare final received amounts after routing and gas. MetaMask’s embedded ETH staking has separate commissions, eligibility rules and risks.

Both apps are free to download. As of September 11, 2026, Rabby's standard in-wallet swap fee is 0.25%, compared with MetaMask's 0.875%. That compares the wallet charges, not live quotes for buying the same tokens.

Swap And Bridge Pricing

On a hypothetical $1,000 swap, those percentages represent $2.50 and $8.75, a $6.25 difference before other execution costs. Rabby waives its swap fee when both tokens belong to the same published eligibility group on the same chain. The exemption does not cover every stablecoin, bridges or network fees.

Cross-chain Rabby routes include a 0.25% wallet service charge in the quote. MetaMask also aggregates cross-chain routes through services including LI.FI and Socket. Route availability, price impact, gas and destination delivery can outweigh a smaller wallet charge. Compare final received amounts using the same assets, networks, size and time.

Rabby's prepaid GasAccount sends native gas tokens to your wallet address on supported chains. It debits maximum estimated transaction gas plus the transfer cost of delivering those tokens. Token-funded balances are withdrawable, while Apple Pay and Google Pay funding is not.

Staking And Fiat Services

MetaMask offers pooled ETH staking with a 15% reward commission. Its Portfolio validator service charges 10% of rewards and requires 32 ETH to enter. Pooled exits involve an unstake request and later claim, with network-dependent waiting. Regional eligibility and contract, validator and slashing risks need separate consideration. Connecting Rabby to a staking dApp uses that provider's conditions.

For normal crypto purchases, MetaMask's 1% wallet charge is already inside the displayed processing fee. Do not add it twice. Purchase providers apply their own identity and regional requirements. Optional card or financial-account products have separate terms and do not decide ordinary EVM signing costs.

Privacy And Data Collection

EVM transaction histories remain public. Offchain services can receive balance queries and transaction requests, including for hardware-controlled accounts.

Rabby Wallet MetaMask
Public Chain Activity
EVM transaction history remains public
EVM transaction history remains public
Optional Services
Cloud backup and connected services add data recipients
Social recovery, analytics and alerts have separate data flows
No clear winner

Privacy-sensitive users can avoid optional online recovery and review each connected service in either wallet. MetaMask's analytics controls and Rabby's policy categories are different disclosures, not measurements proving lower collection by one app.

App Data And Network Providers

Rabby's December 9, 2025 privacy policy names OPCODE LABS PTE. LTD. and describes contact information, device data, usage information and IP-address collection.

MetaMask's analytics guidance distinguishes onboarding choices. Social-login accounts participate by default, while phrase-based setup requests an opt-in. Events may be associated with addresses or transaction hashes and use Segment and Mixpanel. Users can opt out and request deletion.

MetaMask security analysis separately receives the dApp URL, request method, chain identifier and transaction payload. Analytics settings and security alerts are separate controls. A custom RPC changes the recipient of applicable blockchain requests without removing every other service connection.

Recovery, Providers And Identity

Rabby cloud backup and MetaMask social setup add external recovery services. Both permit phrase setups without those options.

Fiat providers, support conversations and connected dApps have their own data needs. Creating a wallet differs from buying crypto through an identity-checked provider. Neither an email-free phrase setup nor a custom RPC makes subsequent activity anonymous.

Updates, Longevity, And Ecosystem

Both publish client development records. Component licenses and backups affect migration, but neither establishes a longer future support life.

Rabby Wallet MetaMask
Public Development Records
Extension, mobile and desktop repositories
Extension and mobile repositories
Extension Reuse Terms
MIT terms; Rabby branding reserved
Restrictive custom license
Tie

Both expose development records and offer portable recovery material for ordinary EVM accounts. Rabby's extension reuse terms differ from MetaMask's, but neither licensing nor a recent release guarantees future support or continued hosted features.

Rabby publishes extension, mobile and desktop repositories. Its extension uses MIT terms but reserves the Rabby brand name and logo. Those permissions should not be assigned automatically to every mobile dependency, hosted service or desktop component.

MetaMask publishes extension and mobile source under separate restrictive licenses. Public availability permits inspection within those terms, not unrestricted open-source reuse. MetaMask's September 10, 2026 extension release was 13.47.1. The developer records a Firefox build-reproducibility fix, distinct from independent verification of a store binary.

For someone switching from MetaMask to Rabby Wallet, owner-held recovery material reduces dependence on one interface for compatible EVM accounts. It does not reproduce MetaMask-only services or native non-EVM support. Keep the old installation until the expected addresses, balances and signing route are established in the replacement.

Final Verdict

MetaMask is our overall pick. Rabby is the more focused choice for EVM users who prioritize lower in-wallet swap fees.

Runner-up

Rabby Wallet

7.5 Very Good
Best For
  • People using EVM dApps who want signing previews and can manage their own recovery material.

Pros

  • Extension code published under MIT terms
  • Hardware keys can remain on the device
  • Optional encrypted mobile cloud backup
  • Token approvals can be revoked in-app
  • Tracks EVM tokens and DeFi positions

Cons

  • No native Bitcoin, Solana or Tron
  • Custom networks have fewer features
  • Mobile hardware support is more limited
  • Apple/Google Pay gas deposits cannot be withdrawn
  • 2025 audits include unresolved findings
Verdict

Choose Rabby if your activity stays on EVM networks and you want lower in-wallet swap fees, integrated portfolio tools or a native desktop client. Check the final quote: a lower wallet fee does not guarantee a cheaper swap.

Winner

MetaMask

8.2 Very Good
Best For
  • Users who want EVM applications and native multichain transfers in one wallet.

Pros

  • Default-on transaction security alerts
  • Mobile connections to compatible hardware
  • ETH pooled staking without a product minimum
  • In-wallet cross-chain swap routes
  • Publicly accessible extension source code

Cons

  • Swaps carry a 0.875% service fee
  • Social recovery depends on online services
  • TRON dApp support has conflicting documentation
  • Linked Ledger accounts are EVM-only
  • New US and UK Card enrollment is paused
Verdict

Choose MetaMask if you want native Bitcoin and Solana alongside EVM accounts, Firefox support, or its supported linked-login recovery. Check hardware compatibility and recovery requirements for the accounts you plan to use.

Affiliate Disclosure

Some links in this comparison are affiliate links. CryptoSlate may earn a commission if you sign up through these links. Our ratings remain editorially independent.

MetaMask wins final rating

The overall winner follows our separate wallet review scores, not a count of category wins.

Rabby Wallet vs MetaMask FAQs

Is Rabby Wallet or MetaMask safer for DeFi?

Neither has established superior detection across the same malicious requests and current app versions. Both show transaction information and warnings that users can override. A compatible hardware account keeps signing keys on a separate device, but a misleading approval can still authorize losses. Check the requested permissions and the device's own display before signing.

Can Rabby Wallet and MetaMask use the same recovery phrase?

Both accept recovery material for EVM accounts, but confirm that the expected addresses appear after import. Account discovery and derivation settings can differ, and separately imported keys require separate backups. Sharing a phrase also shares compromise risk. Rabby cannot recreate MetaMask's native Bitcoin or Solana interface simply by importing the same words.

Is Rabby Wallet or MetaMask cheaper for swaps?

Rabby's standard wallet swap fee is 0.25%, versus MetaMask's 0.875%, checked September 11, 2026. Rabby also exempts eligible same-chain token pairs from its swap fee. These percentages do not establish the best final exchange rate. Compare quoted output and network charges for the same amount, assets and route before confirming.

Does Rabby Wallet or MetaMask support Bitcoin and Solana?

MetaMask supports native Bitcoin and Solana alongside EVM networks. Rabby focuses on EVM networks and excludes those native chains. Holding a Bitcoin-related token on Ethereum differs from controlling a Bitcoin address. Hardware connections have separate limits, so MetaMask's native asset support does not imply Bitcoin or Solana access through its Ledger integration.

How do Rabby Wallet and MetaMask recover a lost phone?

Rabby Mobile can restore from retained recovery material or a configured cloud backup with its original backup password. MetaMask social-login accounts use the linked identity and password, with phrase export as a fallback. Phrase-based MetaMask accounts need their recovery material. Hardware accounts use their device's recovery process, not the app's software backup.

Are Rabby Wallet and MetaMask open source?

Rabby's extension publishes MIT terms with restrictions on reuse of its branding. Its mobile and desktop source are public, but the extension license does not automatically govern every component. MetaMask's extension and mobile repositories use separate restrictive licenses. Source visibility helps inspection but does not prove a downloaded release matches that source or contains no vulnerabilities.

Can Rabby Wallet and MetaMask connect to hardware wallets?

Yes, with different platform lists. Both extensions support Ledger and Trezor. Rabby Mobile lists Ledger and Trezor over Bluetooth, Keystone and OneKey, while MetaMask Mobile lists Ledger, Keystone and NGRAVE ZERO. Confirm the exact model and transport before choosing an app. Pair the signer without entering its recovery phrase into either software wallet.

Do Rabby Wallet and MetaMask require KYC?

Their ordinary phrase-based self-custody setup does not require a wallet-level identity check. Optional purchases and financial services can add provider verification and regional conditions. MetaMask social login requires a linked account and password, while Rabby's cloud backup requires the relevant cloud access. Those dependencies differ from a blanket KYC requirement for every wallet transaction.

Loading image…

The Catalyst by CryptoSlate

Understand what’s moving crypto.

The stories that matter, the context behind them, and what to watch next.

Published on Substack

Subscribe to The Catalyst by CryptoSlate through Substack.

Seven days a week. Unsubscribe anytime.

Check your inbox.

Look in spam or promotions if you don’t see it.