Share this article

SUI Plunges 9% Amid Flash Crash and Extraordinary Selling Volume

Sui token stabilizes around $3.43 after dramatic midnight selloff and recovery pattern forms

Updated May 30, 2025, 12:30 p.m. Published May 30, 2025, 10:53 a.m.
SUI/USD (CoinDesk Data)
SUI/USD (CoinDesk Data)

What to know:

  • A flash crash between 09:37-09:38 saw price drop from $3.45 to $3.40 with extraordinary volume exceeding 4.3 million units.
  • Despite the correction, key support emerged at $3.40 with substantial buying interest, suggesting potential stabilization around $3.43-$3.44.

SUI plummeted 9.25% from $3.72 to $3.38, with heaviest selling during midnight hours UTC on volume 78% higher than daily average

The recent correction comes amid broader geopolitical tensions affecting cryptocurrency markets globally.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the Crypto Daybook Americas Newsletter today. See all newsletters

While Bitcoin has shown resilience above critical resistance zones, SUI has faced downward pressure despite strong fundamentals.

The Cetus Protocol exploit that resulted in $223 million in stolen assets (with $162 million frozen) has created uncertainty, though the Sui community appears poised to approve a recovery plan with 71% of validators already voting "yes" to return the frozen funds.

Technical Analysis Breakdown

  • SUI-USD dropped from a high of $3.728 to a low of $3.383, representing a 9.25% correction.
  • Strongest selling pressure occurred during the midnight hour (00:00) with 4.0% price drop on 78% higher-than-average volume.
  • Strong resistance established at $3.55 level.
  • Recovery attempts visible at $3.42 support with above-average volume during 01:00-02:00 period.
  • Lower highs forming a descending trendline, indicating continued bearish pressure.
  • Flash crash occurred between 09:37-09:38, with price plummeting from $3.45 to $3.40.
  • Extraordinary volume of 4.3 million units recorded during the flash crash.
  • V-shaped reversal pattern formed, reclaiming approximately 60% of losses.
  • Price stabilization around $3.43-$3.44 range.
  • Key support at $3.40 showing substantial buying interest across multiple timeframes.
  • New resistance formed at $3.45-$3.46, creating a consolidation range. Diminishing selling pressure suggests potential near-term stabilization.

AI Disclaimer: Parts of this article were generated with the assistance from AI tools and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and adherence to our standards. For more information, see CoinDesk's full AI Policy.

More For You

Protocol Research: GoPlus Security

GP Basic Image

What to know:

  • As of October 2025, GoPlus has generated $4.7M in total revenue across its product lines. The GoPlus App is the primary revenue driver, contributing $2.5M (approx. 53%), followed by the SafeToken Protocol at $1.7M.
  • GoPlus Intelligence's Token Security API averaged 717 million monthly calls year-to-date in 2025 , with a peak of nearly 1 billion calls in February 2025. Total blockchain-level requests, including transaction simulations, averaged an additional 350 million per month.
  • Since its January 2025 launch , the $GPS token has registered over $5B in total spot volume and $10B in derivatives volume in 2025. Monthly spot volume peaked in March 2025 at over $1.1B , while derivatives volume peaked the same month at over $4B.

Más para ti

Tom Lee responds to controversy surrounding Fundstrat’s differing bitcoin outlooks

Fundstrat Global Advisors Head of Research Tom Lee (Photo by Ilya S. Savenok / Getty Images for BitMine)

A debate on X over seemingly conflicting bitcoin forecasts from Fundstrat analysts drew a response from Tom Lee, highlighting differing mandates and time horizons.

Lo que debes saber:

  • X users flagged what appeared to be conflicting bitcoin outlooks from Fundstrat’s Tom Lee and Sean Farrell.
  • Lee endorsed a post arguing the views reflect different mandates and time horizons, not internal disagreement.
  • The episode highlights how public commentary can blur distinctions between short-term risk management and long-term macro views.