Share this article

Bit4You Affairs in Doubt Even Before CoinLoan Collapse, Belgian Regulator Says

FSMA’s comments suggest the exchange could have lost its license or potentially faced prosecution, even before Bit4You's Estonian corporate partner filed for insolvency.

Updated May 9, 2023, 8:35 a.m. Published May 8, 2023, 7:00 p.m.
Belgium's regulator revealed details about crypto exchange Bit4You (fdecomite/Flickr)
Belgium's regulator revealed details about crypto exchange Bit4You (fdecomite/Flickr)

Bit4You, the oldest crypto exchange in Belgium, was already facing loss of its registration or prosecution, even before it announced it was suspending activities in April, according to a Monday statement by the country’s financial regulator.

Bit4You said it was suspending activities in April, citing the collapse in Estonia of its service provider CoinLoan which held many of its funds – but revelations made today by Belgium’s Financial Services and Markets Authority (FSMA) suggest there may be more to the story.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the State of Crypto Newsletter today. See all newsletters

“FSMA had previously notified Bit4You of its intention to refuse its request for registration” even before the crypto exchange asked to have its provisional registration withdrawn on May 2, the regulator said in a statement.

FSMA had “informed the public prosecutor of irregularities noted in regard to the former management” while assessing the company’s application under money-laundering rules, the statement said, adding that the company had been “forced to modify all its governance structures” as a result of the regulator’s findings.

Belgium’s crypto registration regime took effect in May 2022, but existing companies such as Bit4You were able to keep a provisional license while their fuller application was considered.

In an April 26 blog post, Bit4You said it was suspending activities due to the CoinLoan insolvency, and subsequently itself filed for administration in a Belgian court.

The Belgian public prosecutor's office told CoinDesk that it had "opened a file on Bit4You following the accusation by FSMA," adding that "an investigation is ongoing."

Bit4You did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Read more: Belgian Crypto Lender Bit4You Suspends Activities After Service Provider Declared Insolvent

FSMA statements have been translated from French.

UPDATE (May 9, 08:35 UTC): Adds comment from Belgian public prosecutor.

More For You

Protocol Research: GoPlus Security

GP Basic Image

What to know:

  • As of October 2025, GoPlus has generated $4.7M in total revenue across its product lines. The GoPlus App is the primary revenue driver, contributing $2.5M (approx. 53%), followed by the SafeToken Protocol at $1.7M.
  • GoPlus Intelligence's Token Security API averaged 717 million monthly calls year-to-date in 2025 , with a peak of nearly 1 billion calls in February 2025. Total blockchain-level requests, including transaction simulations, averaged an additional 350 million per month.
  • Since its January 2025 launch , the $GPS token has registered over $5B in total spot volume and $10B in derivatives volume in 2025. Monthly spot volume peaked in March 2025 at over $1.1B , while derivatives volume peaked the same month at over $4B.

More For You

Coinbase files lawsuits in 3 states over attempts to regulate prediction markets

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong speaking to House Speaker Mike Johnson on July 18, 2025. (Jesse Hamilton/CoinDesk)

The crypto exchange is taking legal action against Connecticut, Michigan and Illinois, Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal wrote on X.

What to know:

  • Coinbase sued Connecticut, Illinois and Michigan over the three states' attempts to regulate prediction markets.
  • The crypto exchange filed lawsuits to "confirm what is clear," Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal wrote in a post on X on Friday: that prediction markets fall under the jurisdiction of the CFTC.
  • Prediction markets enable users to speculate on the outcome of future events by buying shares in contracts pegged to the potential results.
  • State gaming regulators are flexing their muscles to prevent such services being offered on the basis they are a form of gambling.