Share this article

Crypto Industry Portrayed 'Illusion of Respectability', Paul Krugman Says

In a New York Times article, the economist examined how the industry was able to market itself to respectable institutions and individuals.

Updated May 11, 2023, 6:31 p.m. Published Jul 12, 2022, 4:23 p.m.
The recent market downturn has made regulating crypto "politically possible." (Best Backgrounds/Shutterstock)
The recent market downturn has made regulating crypto "politically possible." (Best Backgrounds/Shutterstock)

The cryptocurrency industry bought itself an "illusion of respectability" after luring investors with "technobabble and libertarian derp," economist Paul Krugman wrote in The New York Times.

  • The Nobel Prize winner wrote an opinion piece Monday examining how the industry was able to market itself to respectable institutions and individuals.
  • The industry "has been spectacularly successful at marketing itself, creating an image of being both cutting edge and respectable," he wrote.
  • Krugman cited, for example, digital payments app Venmo inviting users to "begin [their] crypto journey" on its homepage and famous universities offering programs to learn about crypto.
  • "I doubt there was any corruption ... Still, there clearly were and are financial rewards involved. I don’t know how much money Venmo makes from people buying and selling crypto on its platform, but it’s certainly not offering the service out of sheer good will. If you want to take, say, M.I.T.’s online blockchain course, it will cost you $3,500."
  • With this degree of mainstream acceptance, according to Krugman, crypto became "too big to regulate."
  • While the recent downturn in the crypto markets has made effective regulation "politically possible," the opportunity must be seized by central banks and other bodies "before crypto stops being a mere casino and becomes a threat to financial stability," Krugman wrote, referencing a recent speech on crypto regulation by Lael Brainard, the Federal Reserve vice chair.
  • Krugman has expressed skepticism about crypto on several occasions, going back to 2013 when he dubbed bitcoin "evil." He wrote in January this year that he saw parallels between crypto and the subprime mortgage crisis of the 2000s.

Read more: Why the Crypto Crash Will Accelerate Regulatory Action

STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the State of Crypto Newsletter today. See all newsletters

More For You

KuCoin Hits Record Market Share as 2025 Volumes Outpace Crypto Market

16:9 Image

KuCoin captured a record share of centralised exchange volume in 2025, with more than $1.25tn traded as its volumes grew faster than the wider crypto market.

What to know:

  • KuCoin recorded over $1.25 trillion in total trading volume in 2025, equivalent to an average of roughly $114 billion per month, marking its strongest year on record.
  • This performance translated into an all-time high share of centralised exchange volume, as KuCoin’s activity expanded faster than aggregate CEX volumes, which slowed during periods of lower market volatility.
  • Spot and derivatives volumes were evenly split, each exceeding $500 billion for the year, signalling broad-based usage rather than reliance on a single product line.
  • Altcoins accounted for the majority of trading activity, reinforcing KuCoin’s role as a primary liquidity venue beyond BTC and ETH at a time when majors saw more muted turnover.
  • Even as overall crypto volumes softened mid-year, KuCoin maintained elevated baseline activity, indicating structurally higher user engagement rather than short-lived volume spikes.

More For You

Ukraine banned Polymarket and there’s no legal way for it to come back

Kyiv in Ukraine (Glib Albovsky/Unsplash/Modified by CoinDesk)

Polymarket and similar platforms are considered unlicensed gambling operators, leading to blocked access.

What to know:

  • Ukraine has no legal framework for Web3 prediction markets, and current legislation provides no recognition for such platforms.
  • Polymarket and similar platforms are considered unlicensed gambling operators, leading to blocked access.
  • Legal changes are unlikely in the near future, as Parliamentary revisions to gambling definitions are extremely improbable during wartime, leaving prediction markets in a legal deadlock.