Share this article
Ethereum's Vlad Zamfir Files Injunction Against CasperLabs Citing Copyright Infringement
Zamfir is alleging CasperLabs intentionally violated the U.S. Trademark Act by filing a federal registration of the Casper mark without his knowledge or consent.
Updated Sep 14, 2021, 12:31 p.m. Published Mar 24, 2021, 9:41 a.m.
Make us preferred on Google
Ethereum Foundation researcher Vlad Zamfir has filed a complaint against blockchain startup CasperLabs alleging the company has violated U.S. Federal trademark law.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the Crypto Daybook Americas Newsletter today. See all newsletters
According to a court document filed on March 17, Zamfir is accusing the startup of labeling its proof-of-stake (PoS) protocol "Casper" and for filing for federal registration of the Casper mark.
The issue, Zamfir claims, is that CasperLabs has improperly used the mark to benefit commercially while causing confusion and damage because Zamfir's own PoS research, stretching six years back, is of the same name.
Zamfir says he and Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin developed a PoS protocol called "Casper" in 2015 that was then followed with a first draft version in 2017.
The Casper protocol 1.0 specification then went live in 2018, where it was subsequently picked up by CasperLabs the following year after hiring Zamfir as its lead consensus protocol architect.
CasperLabs began building a new blockchain based on Zamfir's version of PoS called the "Highway Protocol."
A licensing agreement was drawn up in 2019, Zamfir argues, that provided limited use of the name Casper and Zamfir's research.
"I ... made it clear ... I did not consent to CasperLabs’ use of the name Casper," said Zamfir in the complaint. The Ethereum researcher argues CasperLabs filed a federal registration of the Casper mark without his knowledge or consent.
It is alleged the startup later changed the name to "Casper Highway Protocol" and then finally "Casper" when it sought to launch a coin sale on Tuesday.
As such, Zamfir has filed a civil action for false designation of origin under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. Section 1125(a) and for the "substantial and related claim" of unfair competition under the common law of California.
Zamfir points specifically to Section 43(a) of the act which stipulates that is unlawful for any person to use words or images for commerce that would otherwise cause confusion among others.
In a first supplemental declaration filed in the U.S. District Court Southern District of California on Monday, Zamfir said he had first learned of CasperLabs' U.S. trademark registration and application on Jan. 25, 2021.
See also: Hearing in SEC Case Positive for Ripple, XRP, Says Lawyer
In the declaration, Zamfir alleges CasperLabs changed its Telegram channel name to Casper a month after Zamfir had learned of the registration and application. He provided screenshots of Telegram conversations as evidence.
However, CasperLabs via a notice to strike Zamfir's evidence, argues the screenshots, timing of the evidence and legality around the filing by Zamfir is unauthorized, inadmissible and does not affect the outcome.
More For You
KuCoin captured a record share of centralised exchange volume in 2025, with more than $1.25tn traded as its volumes grew faster than the wider crypto market.
What to know:
- KuCoin recorded over $1.25 trillion in total trading volume in 2025, equivalent to an average of roughly $114 billion per month, marking its strongest year on record.
- This performance translated into an all-time high share of centralised exchange volume, as KuCoin’s activity expanded faster than aggregate CEX volumes, which slowed during periods of lower market volatility.
- Spot and derivatives volumes were evenly split, each exceeding $500 billion for the year, signalling broad-based usage rather than reliance on a single product line.
- Altcoins accounted for the majority of trading activity, reinforcing KuCoin’s role as a primary liquidity venue beyond BTC and ETH at a time when majors saw more muted turnover.
- Even as overall crypto volumes softened mid-year, KuCoin maintained elevated baseline activity, indicating structurally higher user engagement rather than short-lived volume spikes.
More For You
Here’s why bitcoin’s is failing its role as a 'safe haven' versus gold
Bitcoin behaves more like an "ATM" during uncertain times, with investors quickly selling it to raise cash.
What to know:
- During recent geopolitical tensions, Bitcoin lost 6.6% of its value, while gold rose 8.6%, demonstrating bitcoin's vulnerability in times of market stress.
- Bitcoin behaves more like an "ATM" during uncertain times, with investors quickly selling it to raise cash, contrary to its reputation as a stable digital asset.
- Gold remains the preferred hedge for short-term risks, while bitcoin is better suited for long-term monetary and geopolitical uncertainties that unfold over years.
Top Stories
