More Than $1B in ETH Has Been Burned Since Ethereum’s London Hard Fork
In just six weeks, over 297,000 ETH has been permanently removed from circulation.

Ethereum Improvement Proposal (EIP) 1559 was an integral piece of the London hard fork on Aug. 4. The EIP was aimed at stabilizing the transaction fee market, cementing the economic value of ether
Six weeks after the hard fork took place, the network is beginning to reap the benefits of the upgrade. While transaction fees are still nearing all-time highs, gas price volatility has narrowed. Gas price is defined as the amount users are willing to pay for a unit of gas, measured in gwei.
There are two kinds of fees that combine to create the Ethereum transaction fee amount: the base fee and the priority fee. The base fee is the mandatory price a user must pay for their transaction to be added in a block; the priority fee, or tip, is discretionary and can be included to incentivize miners to prioritize the transaction.
The fee market upgrade in EIP 1559 implemented a 12.5% base fee increase or decrease per block, depending on the level of demand in the previous block. Post-upgrade, the miners still receive the priority fee; however, all the ether used for the base fee is now “burned” or permanently removed from the network.
Several days have even been net deflationary for the asset as base fees outweigh block rewards, and investors have noted the newfound scarcity. The burn mechanism is on pace to eliminate 2.56 million ETH that would otherwise be inflating the supply over the course of a year. At current prices this is $8.89 billion and nearly 2.2% of Ethereum’s total market capitalization.
An increased demand for “block space,” created by network usage, has been largely the result of the explosion in the non-fungible token (NFT) market. NFT marketplace OpenSea has been responsible for the burn of 42,072 ETH to date, outpacing Uniswap, wallet-to-wallet transactions and NFT trading game Axie Infinity.
Mais para você
State of the Blockchain 2025

L1 tokens broadly underperformed in 2025 despite a backdrop of regulatory and institutional wins. Explore the key trends defining ten major blockchains below.
O que saber:
2025 was defined by a stark divergence: structural progress collided with stagnant price action. Institutional milestones were reached and TVL increased across most major ecosystems, yet the majority of large-cap Layer-1 tokens finished the year with negative or flat returns.
This report analyzes the structural decoupling between network usage and token performance. We examine 10 major blockchain ecosystems, exploring protocol versus application revenues, key ecosystem narratives, mechanics driving institutional adoption, and the trends to watch as we head into 2026.
Mais para você
Bitcoin isn’t under quantum threat yet, but upgrade could take 5-10 years

Even if quantum machines capable of breaking Bitcoin’s cryptography are decades away, the work required to update software, infrastructure and user behavior would be measured in years, not months.
O que saber:
- Bitcoin developers are preparing for the potential threat of quantum computing, which could take 5 to 10 years to address if necessary.
- The shift in focus is from the immediacy of quantum threats to the logistics of updating Bitcoin's infrastructure and user behavior.
- Bitcoin's conservative governance model complicates large-scale transitions, requiring significant coordination for any move toward quantum-resistant cryptography.











