Share this article

Prime Trust Is Having a Bad Month

The crypto custodian has been ordered to halt operations while its regulator looks to take it over.

Jun 29, 2023, 6:46 p.m.
(Danny Nelson/CoinDesk)
(Danny Nelson/CoinDesk)

Prime Trust may be taken over by the state of Nevada, and the situation seems alarming.

You’re reading State of Crypto, a CoinDesk newsletter looking at the intersection of cryptocurrency and government. Click here to sign up for future editions.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the State of Crypto Newsletter today. See all newsletters

Rough month

The narrative

Prime Trust owes customers more than $80 million in cash that it doesn’t have, court filings this week showed.

Why it matters

Prime Trust, a storied crypto custodian, is only the latest digital asset firm to acknowledge financial issues and face a takeover. But as a custody provider, it occupies a unique space among the various bankruptcies we’ve seen so far.

Breaking it down

On June 8, 2023, my colleague Ian Allison reported that BitGo, a crypto custodian that’s vacuumed up other companies in the past, had begun the process of acquiring Prime Trust, a fellow custody provider.

On June 22, i.e. two weeks later, BitGo walked away from this deal.

That same day, rumors emerged that the state of Nevada had filed a cease-and-desist against Prime Trust, which the state later confirmed by publishing an order which alleged it had a massive deficiency of customer funds and indeed may be insolvent.

Four days after that, the state of Nevada took things a step further, filing for receivership (basically asking for court approval to take over the company) and alleging that Prime Trust a) owed clients about $82 million in fiat that it didn’t have access to and b) lost access to certain crypto wallets in 2021 and so was using customer fiat funds to buy crypto to meet withdrawal requests.

This filing, which was made public on Tuesday, is pretty alarming. It’s got sign-off from Prime Trust’s interim CEO and board, indicating the company is cooperating with the state Financial Institutions Division.

It’s also worth noting that Prime Trust has changed leadership a few times since its founding. The allegations indicate that the custodian used wallets it lost access to in 2021, prior to the current interim CEO’s appointment.

Still, this appears to be the first time these revelations are being publicly disclosed, and the implications are serious.

One of these implications ties to the possible impact to TrueUSD, a stablecoin whose issuer said on June 22 it had “no exposure” to Prime Trust before later acknowledging it had a relatively small amount ($26,000) on the custodian.

Rumors that TrueUSD use Prime Trust to mint and redeem tokens have persisted though, and the token even depegged on Binance.US on Wednesday.

Lawmakers are already paying attention to stablecoin issues, and a bill addressing this sector of the crypto industry is still the most likely to pass through the House before other legislation, so I imagine Congress will take notice if one of the world’s largest stablecoins continues to have issues.

And regulators will of course be paying attention to issues by a regulated custodian.

Stories you may have missed

This week

SoC 062623

Monday

  • 13:15 UTC (2:15 p.m. BST) The U.K.’s House of Commons considered amendments to its Financial Services and Markets Bill.

Wednesday

  • 7:15 UTC (9:15 a.m. CEST) The European Commission published its digital euro bill.
  • 14:00 UTC (10:00 a.m. ET) There was a Celsius bankruptcy hearing.
  • 17:00 UTC (1:00 p.m. ET) The FTX bankruptcy hearing was actually canceled.

Elsewhere:

  • (Bloomberg) Bloomberg filed a Freedom of Information Act request to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation for documents tied to its rescue of Silicon Valley Bank, finding that stablecoin issuer Circle was its largest depositor (with $3.4 billion in the bank). Sequoia Capital also had north of $1 billion that the FDIC protected.
  • (Bloomberg) Venezuela temporarily banned crypto mining, which is not great news for the local crypto industry.

If you’ve got thoughts or questions on what I should discuss next week or any other feedback you’d like to share, feel free to email me at [email protected] or find me on Twitter @nikhileshde.

You can also join the group conversation on Telegram.

See ya’ll next week!

Note: The views expressed in this column are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of CoinDesk, Inc. or its owners and affiliates.

More For You

Pudgy Penguins: A New Blueprint for Tokenized Culture

Pudgy Title Image

Pudgy Penguins is building a multi-vertical consumer IP platform — combining phygital products, games, NFTs and PENGU to monetize culture at scale.

What to know:

Pudgy Penguins is emerging as one of the strongest NFT-native brands of this cycle, shifting from speculative “digital luxury goods” into a multi-vertical consumer IP platform. Its strategy is to acquire users through mainstream channels first; toys, retail partnerships and viral media, then onboard them into Web3 through games, NFTs and the PENGU token.

The ecosystem now spans phygital products (> $13M retail sales and >1M units sold), games and experiences (Pudgy Party surpassed 500k downloads in two weeks), and a widely distributed token (airdropped to 6M+ wallets). While the market is currently pricing Pudgy at a premium relative to traditional IP peers, sustained success depends on execution across retail expansion, gaming adoption and deeper token utility.

More For You

Crypto faces fork in the road as Clarity Act support wavers, Bitwise says

Bitwise Chief Investment Officer Matt Hougan

The asset manager argued that without federal legislation, the industry has three years to become indispensable before political winds potentially shift.

What to know:

  • Bitwise said in a blog post Monday that Polymarket odds for the Clarity Act have fallen from 80% to 50% following industry pushback.
  • If the bill fails, Bitwise believes crypto must achieve mass adoption in stablecoins and tokenization to force a regulatory hand.
  • The firm anticipates a sharp rally upon the bill's passage, while a failure would likely lead to a "slower ascent" tied to proven utility.