Crypto Law Profile

FSB Crypto-Asset Activities Recommendations (2023)

FSB’s 2023 recommendations set a global regulatory baseline for crypto-asset issuers, service providers and activities, covering powers, cooperation, governance, risk, data, disclosures and multi-function intermediaries.

International In force Global standard

At a glance

Status Final FSB report published July 17, 2023.
Legal effect Non-binding baseline for domestic regulation, not self-executing law.
Scope Covers issuers, service providers and risk-relevant DeFi activity; CBDCs excluded.
Implementation review FSB review published Oct. 16, 2025; gaps and inconsistencies remained.

Overview

The Financial Stability Board’s High-level Recommendations for the Regulation, Supervision and Oversight of Crypto-Asset Activities and Markets are a 2023 global standard for national financial regulators considering how to regulate crypto-asset activities and markets. Published on 17 July 2023, the final report sets nine recommendations for authorities over crypto-asset issuers, service providers, trading platforms and other activities that may pose financial stability risk. The recommendations are not self-executing law; they operate as a global regulatory baseline for domestic frameworks and are designed to be technology-neutral and risk-focused.

What the FSB 2023 crypto-asset recommendations cover

The recommendations sit within the FSB’s broader global regulatory framework for crypto-asset activities, alongside separate revised recommendations for global stablecoin arrangements. The framework reflects the principle of “same activity, same risk, same regulation” and is meant to promote more consistent regulatory and supervisory outcomes across jurisdictions. The FSB states that the recommendations are flexible enough to be incorporated into different domestic regulatory systems and do not displace existing legal, supervisory or oversight frameworks.

The report covers crypto-asset activities and markets broadly, including issuers and service providers. It also says the recommendations should inform oversight of activities conducted through so-called decentralized finance protocols when those activities pose, or could pose, financial stability risks. Central bank digital currencies are excluded, and global stablecoin arrangements are addressed through the separate FSB stablecoin recommendations.

Key provisions for regulators and crypto-asset service providers

The first recommendations focus on regulatory powers and perimeter. Authorities are asked to have adequate powers, tools and resources to regulate, supervise and oversee crypto-asset activities and markets, including authorization, licensing, inspections and enforcement tools where applicable. The general framework recommendation asks authorities to apply comprehensive and effective regulation on a functional basis, proportionate to the financial stability risks posed by the relevant activity.

The FSB also emphasizes domestic and international cooperation. Authorities are asked to share information, coordinate in normal and stress periods, and address cross-border service providers whose activities may affect more than one jurisdiction. The framework highlights the risk that offshore structures, fragmented oversight or multi-jurisdictional groups can create regulatory gaps.

Several recommendations address governance, risk management, data and disclosure. Authorities should require crypto-asset issuers and service providers to maintain governance frameworks with clear accountability, risk-management systems proportionate to their activities, data systems that support timely and accurate reporting, and transparent disclosures to users and other stakeholders. The final report also highlights client-asset safeguarding, including controls, ownership-right disclosures, segregation and record-keeping for service providers that hold or safeguard crypto-assets.

Interconnections, DeFi and multi-function intermediaries

The final recommendations ask authorities to monitor connections within the crypto ecosystem and between crypto markets, traditional finance and the real economy. The FSB identifies multi-function crypto-asset service providers as a particular focus because the same group may combine trading, custody, settlement, lending, borrowing, market-making, wallet services or proprietary trading. Where such combinations are permitted, the recommendations call for oversight that addresses conflicts of interest, concentration of control, risk segregation and possible separation of functions.

The report does not comprehensively cover all crypto policy issues. The FSB notes that areas such as AML/CFT, data privacy, cybersecurity, investor protection, market integrity, taxation, monetary policy and competition may be addressed by other standard setters or domestic authorities. However, the report cross-references FATF standards for AML/CFT controls and travel-rule compliance as part of effective risk management.

Status and implementation timeline

The FSB issued a consultative report on 11 October 2022 and requested public responses by 15 December 2022. It published the final recommendations on 17 July 2023 after considering consultation feedback and events in crypto-asset markets during 2022 and early 2023. The 2023 final report committed the FSB, standard-setting bodies and international organizations to continue coordination and review implementation by the end of 2025.

On 16 October 2025, the FSB published a thematic review of its global regulatory framework based on information as of August 2025. That review reported progress in regulating crypto-asset activities and service providers, but also identified significant gaps and inconsistencies across jurisdictions. As of 21 July 2026, this profile treats the 2023 recommendations as an active, non-binding global standard rather than a directly enforceable law.

Key provisions

Regulatory powers and tools

Calls for authorities to have powers, tools and resources for authorization, supervision, examinations, enforcement and perimeter adjustments.

Regulatory powers Source

Functional regulatory framework

Applies “same activity, same risk, same regulation” to crypto-asset activities on a functional and proportionate basis.

Regulatory perimeter Source

Cross-border cooperation

Encourages timely information sharing between domestic and foreign authorities, including for cross-border groups and stressed service providers.

Cross-border cooperation Source

Governance, risk and safeguarding

Addresses governance, risk management, conflict controls, AML/CFT expectations and client-asset safeguarding, including segregation and record-keeping.

Governance and risk Source

Data collection and reporting

Requires robust data systems and regulator access to timely, complete and reliable information needed for oversight mandates.

Data reporting Source

Disclosures to users and stakeholders

Calls for clear disclosures on governance, operations, risks, finances, products, custody terms and ownership rights.

Disclosures Source

Interconnections and multi-function CASPs

Targets interconnections with traditional finance and risks from service providers combining custody, trading, lending, settlement and other functions.

Market interconnections Source

Timeline

  1. Consultative report published

    FSB proposed nine recommendations and invited public comments by Dec. 15, 2022.

    Under consultation Source
  2. Consultation period closed

    Public consultation period for the proposed crypto-asset recommendations closed.

    Under consultation Source
  3. Final recommendations published

    FSB published the final report with nine high-level recommendations for authorities.

    Enacted Source
  4. Implementation review published

    FSB thematic review assessed implementation progress and found gaps across jurisdictions.

    Enacted Source

Who it affects

Actors

FATF, Financial Stability Board, G20, IOSCO

Asset classes

Crypto assets, Stablecoins

Official sources

Editorial note

Non-binding FSB global standard. The recommendations are addressed to financial regulatory, supervisory and oversight authorities at jurisdictional level and require domestic implementation to become legally enforceable.

Status taxonomy uses In force as the closest controlled term for an active published international standard, not as a statement of direct legal effect.