Chinese Arbitration Body Says Crypto Crackdown ‘Isn’t a Bitcoin Ban’

Ban Bitcoin China Regulation
Author
Author
Tim AlperVerified
Part of the Team Since
Jan 2018
About Author

Tim Alper is a British journalist and features writer who has worked at Cryptonews.com since 2018. He has written for media outlets such as the BBC, the Guardian, and Chosun Ilbo. He has also worked...

Last updated: 

Beijing’s local arbiter has attempted to clarify the government’s stance on bitcoin (BTC) – and stated that the world’s most notorious crypto ban is not exactly a “ban” per se.

Source: Adobe/Mariia Korneeva

In an unprecedented move from a Chinese legal body, the Beijing Arbitration Commission (BJAC) – one of nine local legal bodies established to police courts nationwide in 1995 – has issued a statement on bitcoin and its legal standing in its latest newsletter.

The BJAC said that rather than enforcing a bitcoin ban, China in fact “has no laws on bitcoin.”

Instead, Chinese law has strict regulations pertaining to “virtual property” – and what exactly comprises non-tangible property on Chinese soil. Bitcoin, said the BJAC, does not qualify as “virtual property,” because it has never been legally defined.

This would seem to rub contra to a verdict from an internet court back in 2019, where a judge ruled that bitcoin was indeed a form of “virtual property,” even going as far as adding that it was “protected by Chinese law.”

Bitcoin and other tokens remain exceptionally popular in China, particularly among the middle class, where it is seen as a store of value.

Stores, clinics, and restaurants in Japan and South Korea in hotspots frequented by Chinese tourists have been accepting bitcoin and other tokens for several years.

The BJAC statement went yet further, though, hinting that the crypto crackdown of September 2017 was possibly overstated.

Rather than “prohibiting bitcoin-related activities,” BTC simply may not be used as “legal tender,” the BJAC stated.

However, it added that bitcoin could, for instance, be used in equity transfers – so long as it did not behave as a “currency,” but instead remained a “general property.”

The BJAC wrote,

“[Equity] transactions do not violate Chinese regulations and thus should be considered valid.”

However, the BJAC did stipulate that initial coin offerings (ICOs) remain illegal, and clarified the government’s stance on crypto exchanges, stating that all crypto-to-crypto and fiat-crypto-fiat trading platforms are banned under Chinese law.

2M+

Active Monthly Users Around the World

250+

Guides and Reviews Articles

8

Years on the Market

70

International Team Authors
editors
+72 More
At Cryptonews, we aim to make cryptocurrency, blockchain, and Web3 understandable, and information available to everyone, no matter what level you are in your investment journey. Founded in 2017, Cryptonews has been dedicated to delivering reliable, multilingual coverage of the cryptocurrency industry.

Best Crypto ICOs

Discover trending tokens still in presale — early-stage picks with potential.

Explore Our Tools

Smart tools made for everyday crypto users

Market Overview

  • 7d
  • 1m
  • 1y
Market Cap
$3,109,936,786,018
-0.33
Trending Crypto

More Articles

Ethereum News
Ethereum Is Emerging as a Global Public Good – and That Changes How It Should Be Valued, Says William Mougayar
Tanzeel Akhtar
Tanzeel Akhtar
2025-12-23 17:58:02
News
Institutions Corner 11% of ETH Supply as Exchange Balances Hit Record Lows
David Pokima
David Pokima
2025-12-23 17:10:40
Crypto News in numbers
editors
Authors List + 66 More
2M+
Active Monthly Users Around the World
250+
Guides and Reviews Articles
8
Years on the Market
70
International Team Authors