Share this article

Algorand Foundation CEO: SEC’s Crypto Crackdown Highlights Lack of Regulatory Clarity

Staci Warden told CoinDesk TV crypto-native firms are being punished rather than given guidance.

Feb 13, 2023, 7:45 p.m.
jwp-player-placeholder

Had the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) laid out clear guidelines, centralized crypto exchange Kraken and its staking-as-a-service platform could have been within the purview of the regulatory agency, said Staci Warden, CEO of the Algorand Foundation.

Instead, Kraken is “being punished, as opposed to given guidance,” Warden told CoinDesk TV’s “First Mover” on Monday.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the State of Crypto Newsletter today. See all newsletters

Last week, the SEC reached a $30 million settlement with Kraken and the San Francisco-based exchange “immediately” closed down its staking-as-a-service platform to its U.S.-based customers.

Kraken began offering staking services in 2019. However, according to the regulator’s press release, its staking services were promoting the sale of an unregistered security.

Warden said that if Kraken’s protocol had been more of a “pass-through profit-taking from the underlying protocol,” the agency might have been fine with Kraken.

The SEC could argue that because Kraken is an exchange that happens to offer digital assets, it should still be regulated like other exchanges that fall under the agency’s jurisdiction, she added.

According to Warden, the broader issue is that regulation for crypto has yet to be defined.

The SEC also reportedly plans to sue stablecoin issuer Paxos, a fintech firm that offers crypto services, over its alleged sale of an unregistered security, stablecoin token Binance USD (BUSD).

“It’s not the regulation so much, it’s the way that regulation is taking place,” Warden said. She added that regulation by enforcement and the lack of regulatory clarity is making it difficult for crypto platforms to know what the agency wants from them.

That may, in turn, have a substantial impact on crypto and the use of stablecoins and staking, which Warden said are “important primitives” to the industry overall.

“They are trying to do the right thing,” Warden said of the industry, pointing to Kraken and Coinbase as examples. “And with some better regulatory clarity upfront, they would have, in my view, probably done exactly what the SEC needed them to do,” Warden said.

Read more: SEC to Sue Crypto Trust Co. Paxos Over Binance Stablecoin: WSJ

More For You

KuCoin Hits Record Market Share as 2025 Volumes Outpace Crypto Market

16:9 Image

KuCoin captured a record share of centralised exchange volume in 2025, with more than $1.25tn traded as its volumes grew faster than the wider crypto market.

What to know:

  • KuCoin recorded over $1.25 trillion in total trading volume in 2025, equivalent to an average of roughly $114 billion per month, marking its strongest year on record.
  • This performance translated into an all-time high share of centralised exchange volume, as KuCoin’s activity expanded faster than aggregate CEX volumes, which slowed during periods of lower market volatility.
  • Spot and derivatives volumes were evenly split, each exceeding $500 billion for the year, signalling broad-based usage rather than reliance on a single product line.
  • Altcoins accounted for the majority of trading activity, reinforcing KuCoin’s role as a primary liquidity venue beyond BTC and ETH at a time when majors saw more muted turnover.
  • Even as overall crypto volumes softened mid-year, KuCoin maintained elevated baseline activity, indicating structurally higher user engagement rather than short-lived volume spikes.

More For You

Ukraine banned Polymarket and there’s no legal way for it to come back

Kyiv in Ukraine (Glib Albovsky/Unsplash/Modified by CoinDesk)

Polymarket and similar platforms are considered unlicensed gambling operators, leading to blocked access.

What to know:

  • Ukraine has no legal framework for Web3 prediction markets, and current legislation provides no recognition for such platforms.
  • Polymarket and similar platforms are considered unlicensed gambling operators, leading to blocked access.
  • Legal changes are unlikely in the near future, as Parliamentary revisions to gambling definitions are extremely improbable during wartime, leaving prediction markets in a legal deadlock.