Share this article

US Government Bans Researcher for Supercomputer Bitcoin Mining

A National Science Foundation (NSF) researcher has been blacklisted after mining bitcoin without authorization.

Updated Sep 11, 2021, 10:51 a.m. Published Jun 5, 2014, 6:00 p.m.
supercomputer

A National Science Foundation (NSF) researcher has been barred from working with the US government following the discovery that he used federally funded supercomputers to mine bitcoin without authorization.

The administrative action was revealed as part of the latest NSF Office of Inspector General (OIG) report issued to Congress and recently posted online.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the Crypto Daybook Americas Newsletter today. See all newsletters

The unnamed researcher is alleged to have used more than $150,000 in NSF-supported computer activity to generate an estimated $8,000 to $10,000 in BTC.

The researcher asserted that he was simply conducting tests on the supercomputers, but both of his affiliated universities denied that they had authorized such actions.

Further, the report asserts that investigations lead to evidence that the individual had taken steps to hide the mining efforts, stating:

"The researcher accessed the computer systems remotely and may have taken steps to conceal his activities, including accessing one supercomputer through a mirror site in Europe."

The report summary concluded by indicating that the NSF has been suspended from providing any further work to any US government body.

Unanswered questions

The NSF OIG report suggested that the abuse was uncovered by the agency after it received reports about the unauthorized activity.

However, no further details about how these discoveries were made were provided.

The report also gave a basic overview of bitcoin, noting that it is a "virtual currency that is independent of national currencies", and that it can be converted into real currencies using certain exchanges.

Increasing incidents

The announcement, while notable, is not the first time that a researcher has been reprimanded for using cutting-edge computers without permission to mine digital currencies.

This February

a Harvard researcher was barred from accessing any of the university's research computing facilities after he was caught mining dogecoin.

University computers have also become a magnet for students looking to generate digital currencies using advanced equipment and the free power universities provide. For example, in late April, Iowa State University indicated that its computer security systems were compromised by students attempting to mine bitcoin.

Hat tip to Bitcoin Magazine

Supercomputer via Shutterstock

More For You

Protocol Research: GoPlus Security

GP Basic Image

What to know:

  • As of October 2025, GoPlus has generated $4.7M in total revenue across its product lines. The GoPlus App is the primary revenue driver, contributing $2.5M (approx. 53%), followed by the SafeToken Protocol at $1.7M.
  • GoPlus Intelligence's Token Security API averaged 717 million monthly calls year-to-date in 2025 , with a peak of nearly 1 billion calls in February 2025. Total blockchain-level requests, including transaction simulations, averaged an additional 350 million per month.
  • Since its January 2025 launch , the $GPS token has registered over $5B in total spot volume and $10B in derivatives volume in 2025. Monthly spot volume peaked in March 2025 at over $1.1B , while derivatives volume peaked the same month at over $4B.

More For You

Tom Lee responds to controversy surrounding Fundstrat’s differing bitcoin outlooks

Fundstrat Global Advisors Head of Research Tom Lee (Photo by Ilya S. Savenok / Getty Images for BitMine)

A debate on X over seemingly conflicting bitcoin forecasts from Fundstrat analysts drew a response from Tom Lee, highlighting differing mandates and time horizons.

What to know:

  • X users flagged what appeared to be conflicting bitcoin outlooks from Fundstrat’s Tom Lee and Sean Farrell.
  • Lee endorsed a post arguing the views reflect different mandates and time horizons, not internal disagreement.
  • The episode highlights how public commentary can blur distinctions between short-term risk management and long-term macro views.