Share this article

Darknet's Largest Marketplace Still Offline; Fears of Exit Scam Rise

Empire Market, the darknet's most popular marketplace by site traffic, was suddenly taken offline on Aug. 22.

Updated Sep 14, 2021, 9:48 a.m. Published Aug 26, 2020, 11:01 a.m.
crime

A top darknet site used to sell illicit goods has been offline for more than three days, with fears growing that administrators may have fled with an estimated $30 million in cryptocurrency.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the Crypto Daybook Americas Newsletter today. See all newsletters

  • According to a Tuesday report by Darknetstats, Empire Market, the darknet's most popular marketplace by site traffic, was suddenly taken offline on Aug. 22.
  • Speculation is mounting over the whereabouts of the site's administrators, who some believe have made off with an estimated 2,638 bitcoin ($30.2 million), according to John Marsh, a Darknetstats representative, speaking to CoinDesk via email.
  • However, Marsh said that figure is not certain as no large movements of funds have been identified.
  • There is plenty of speculation, but nothing "concrete" about what has happened to the site, he said.
  • An Empire Market head moderator known as "Se7en" confirmed the site was down on the darknet forum Dread late Tuesday evening.
  • Se7en suggested the incident was not an exit scam because that usually entails disabling withdrawals and accepting bitcoin for a period of weeks.
  • Marsh, however, contested this and said his publication believes it was an "unplanned exit scam," as bitcoin withdrawals were working up to the day the marketplace went offline.
  • The darknet refers to certain sections on the internet that are only accessible with specific software and use unique communication protocols to provide access.
  • According to a tweet thread by anonymous darknet journalist "dark.fail," the darknet has been in a "golden age of trust" but darknet users should "expect a rough year of exit scams ahead."
  • Dark.fail added that, while it's easy to have a sound idealogy when creating a darknet market, when thousands of bitcoin become involved "greed can defeat all good intentions."
  • One theory raised by Se7en is that Empire Market had been the subject of an ongoing direct denial of service (DDoS) attack and the controllers had just decided to "call it quits."
  • The site has suffered multiple such attacks since going online in 2018 and has been extorted for between $10,000 to $15,000 per week to keep the site live, according to Marsh.

See also: Online Black Markets’ Bitcoin Revenues Take a Hit Amid Pandemic

More For You

Protocol Research: GoPlus Security

GP Basic Image

What to know:

  • As of October 2025, GoPlus has generated $4.7M in total revenue across its product lines. The GoPlus App is the primary revenue driver, contributing $2.5M (approx. 53%), followed by the SafeToken Protocol at $1.7M.
  • GoPlus Intelligence's Token Security API averaged 717 million monthly calls year-to-date in 2025 , with a peak of nearly 1 billion calls in February 2025. Total blockchain-level requests, including transaction simulations, averaged an additional 350 million per month.
  • Since its January 2025 launch , the $GPS token has registered over $5B in total spot volume and $10B in derivatives volume in 2025. Monthly spot volume peaked in March 2025 at over $1.1B , while derivatives volume peaked the same month at over $4B.

More For You

Tom Lee responds to controversy surrounding Fundstrat’s differing bitcoin outlooks

Fundstrat Global Advisors Head of Research Tom Lee (Photo by Ilya S. Savenok / Getty Images for BitMine)

A debate on X over seemingly conflicting bitcoin forecasts from Fundstrat analysts drew a response from Tom Lee, highlighting differing mandates and time horizons.

What to know:

  • X users flagged what appeared to be conflicting bitcoin outlooks from Fundstrat’s Tom Lee and Sean Farrell.
  • Lee endorsed a post arguing the views reflect different mandates and time horizons, not internal disagreement.
  • The episode highlights how public commentary can blur distinctions between short-term risk management and long-term macro views.