Share this article

Broker-Dealer Renews Call for ICO Rules After SEC Release

The SEC has released new guidance on digital tokens and ICOs – but one industry stakeholder wants the agency to go a step further.

Updated Sep 13, 2021, 6:47 a.m. Published Aug 3, 2017, 9:00 a.m.
(Michael del Castillo/CoinDesk)
(Michael del Castillo/CoinDesk)

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has released new guidance on digital tokens and ICOs – but one industry stakeholder wants the agency to go a step further.

As CoinDesk reported back in May, New York-based broker-dealer Ouisa Capital formally petitioned the SEC to release clear rules for issuing blockchain tokens. At the time, the firm also called for the agency to put together a so-called regulatory "sandbox," or a framework in which companies can test new products in a limited setting under supervision.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the Crypto Daybook Americas Newsletter today. See all newsletters

The SEC made waves on July 25 when it published the results of an investigation into The DAO, the ethereum-based funding vehicle that collapsed last summer following a code exploit. Investigators determined that the tokens issued and sold in conjunction with the DAO were securities, but opted not to press charges.

Perhaps more notable in that release was the SEC's statement that the offering and sale of digital tokens "are subject to the requirements of the federal securities law," though it noted that the determination of whether a particular token constitutes a security is based on its "particular facts and circumstances."

It was a decision that many in the industry weren't surprised to see – and indeed, some observers saw the SEC release as a positive development for the sake of clarity.

Yet for Vince Molinari, the CEO of Ouisa Capital, the release doesn't go far enough.

Molinari said in an interview that, based on his discussions with the agency, the SEC has "been extraordinarily engaging in this process," stating that in his view, that publication represents a kind of "warning shot heard round the world."

At the same time, Molinari argued for a more formal process, with draft proposals and subsequent feedback from potential stakeholders.

He told CoinDesk:

"We need formal rule-making here. You can't leave it to facts and circumstances."

Molinari went on to state that he thinks the SEC will ultimately move in this direction, adding that Ouisa has also renewed its call for a regulatory sandbox.

"I believe the SEC will take further steps to clarify this, and I think it's really healthy for the environment, for the investing environment and the token environment, so that it has long-term systemic power," he told CoinDesk.

Image by Michael del Castillo for CoinDesk

More For You

Protocol Research: GoPlus Security

GP Basic Image

What to know:

  • As of October 2025, GoPlus has generated $4.7M in total revenue across its product lines. The GoPlus App is the primary revenue driver, contributing $2.5M (approx. 53%), followed by the SafeToken Protocol at $1.7M.
  • GoPlus Intelligence's Token Security API averaged 717 million monthly calls year-to-date in 2025 , with a peak of nearly 1 billion calls in February 2025. Total blockchain-level requests, including transaction simulations, averaged an additional 350 million per month.
  • Since its January 2025 launch , the $GPS token has registered over $5B in total spot volume and $10B in derivatives volume in 2025. Monthly spot volume peaked in March 2025 at over $1.1B , while derivatives volume peaked the same month at over $4B.

More For You

Tom Lee responds to controversy surrounding Fundstrat’s differing bitcoin outlooks

Fundstrat Global Advisors Head of Research Tom Lee (Photo by Ilya S. Savenok / Getty Images for BitMine)

A debate on X over seemingly conflicting bitcoin forecasts from Fundstrat analysts drew a response from Tom Lee, highlighting differing mandates and time horizons.

What to know:

  • X users flagged what appeared to be conflicting bitcoin outlooks from Fundstrat’s Tom Lee and Sean Farrell.
  • Lee endorsed a post arguing the views reflect different mandates and time horizons, not internal disagreement.
  • The episode highlights how public commentary can blur distinctions between short-term risk management and long-term macro views.