Princeton Researchers Developing Bitcoin-Based Prediction Market
A team of Princeton faculty members are developing a prediction market based on bitcoin transactions.

A team of Princeton faculty members are developing a prediction market based on bitcoin transactions.
Prediction markets are purely speculative markets created for the sole purpose of making various predictions, ranging from all sorts of business predictions to more mundane events, such as weather and various real-world events.
Prediction markets are often frowned upon by the financial community, although a number of major companies are said to be using different prediction markets and techniques to gain a competitive edge. These include software companies like Google, chipmakers like Intel and Qualcomm, along with industry heavyweights like GE, Siemens and Arcelor Mittal.
More than just gambling
The basic principle has been around for more than a century. It basically functions like a purely speculative stock market, allowing participants to trade “shares” that are tied to the outcome of certain events.
[post-quote]
The average probability of any given event is calculated using the number of people making different predictions. For example, if more people are willing to bet that Qualcomm will gain a few high-profile design wins for tablets, chances are Intel will lose market share.
Those who bet on Intel will lose their cash if the prediction comes true. Coincidentally, Intel is said to be using prediction markets to manage manufacturing capacity.
The biggest problem with prediction markets is that they are purely speculative and regulators in some jurisdictions view them as a form of gambling.
They are underpinned by people willing to put their money where their mouth is, betting on various outcomes in industries they are familiar with.
One prominent example is Intrade.comhttp://www.intrade.com/v4/home/, which was forced to shut down after the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission concluded it was an illicit form of gambling. Intrade is currently working on a new version of its market, noting that “cold hard cash” can no longer be used as a “carrot” in its model, due to legal impediments.
How about a bitcoin carrot?
This is probably why the Princeton team, led by computer scientist Arvind Narayanan, is experimenting with bitcoin as an alternative to hard currency. Since bitcoin is neither regulated nor centralized, it can be employed in lieu of fiat money, effectively isolating prediction markets from financial oversight. Narayanan said:
“Now that we have this beautiful decentralized system that allows two parties to transact with each other without a central authority, can we make it so that arbitration of events can be decentralized in some form?”
The academic pointed out that the team is already converging on a successful model, but it is still too early to say whether it will work or not. He told the Daily Princetonian that he could not reveal more information until the team has published the research paper.
An existing bitcoin prediction market, Predictious, was founded in July last year. Although relatively unknown, reports suggest that the Irish company has already handled over $300,000 in BTC.
Decentralisation is not enough
Bitcoin developer Mike Hearn believes the idea has the ability to decentralize trading systems, saying:
“Making something decentralized can be a way to avoid these regulatory hassles in a way.”
However, Hearn warns that decentralisation is not a silver bullet, as even decentralised systems can be regulated in other ways.
Narayanan even suggested using the bitcoin exchange rate as a proxy to predict whether the currency will succeed. If a lot of investors believe it will, it could increase its chances of success. He argues that the value of bitcoin could increase twenty-fold if ever becomes a mainstream currency.
However, current investors do not think this will be the case. The value will continue to depend on the level of adoption by mainstream businesses.
Hearn warns that bitcoin will have a hard time competing against PayPal and credit cards, but it might gain a foothold in niche industries, including prediction markets.
Exchange Data Image via Shutterstock
More For You
Pudgy Penguins: A New Blueprint for Tokenized Culture

Pudgy Penguins is building a multi-vertical consumer IP platform — combining phygital products, games, NFTs and PENGU to monetize culture at scale.
What to know:
Pudgy Penguins is emerging as one of the strongest NFT-native brands of this cycle, shifting from speculative “digital luxury goods” into a multi-vertical consumer IP platform. Its strategy is to acquire users through mainstream channels first; toys, retail partnerships and viral media, then onboard them into Web3 through games, NFTs and the PENGU token.
The ecosystem now spans phygital products (> $13M retail sales and >1M units sold), games and experiences (Pudgy Party surpassed 500k downloads in two weeks), and a widely distributed token (airdropped to 6M+ wallets). While the market is currently pricing Pudgy at a premium relative to traditional IP peers, sustained success depends on execution across retail expansion, gaming adoption and deeper token utility.
More For You
Circle’s biggest bear just threw in the towel, but warns the stock is still a crypto roller coaster

Circle’s rising correlation with ether and DeFi exposure drives the re-rating, despite valuation and competition concerns.
What to know:
- Compass Point’s Ed Engel upgraded Circle (CRCL) to Neutral from Sell and cut his price target to $60, arguing the stock now trades more as a proxy for crypto markets than as a standalone fintech.
- Engel notes that CRCL’s performance is increasingly tied to the ether and broader crypto cycles, with more than 75% of USDC supply used in DeFi or on exchanges, and the stock is still trading at a rich premium.
- Potential catalysts such as the CLARITY Act and tokenization of U.S. assets could support USDC growth, but Circle faces mounting competition from new stablecoins and bank-issued “deposit coins,” and its revenue may remain closely linked to speculative crypto activity for years.











