Share this article

Regulator NYDFS Says Paxos Didn't Administer Binance USD in 'Safe and Sound' Manner: Reuters

The New York regulator said Paxos’ management of the stablecoin left it open to use by bad actors.

Updated Feb 13, 2023, 4:38 p.m. Published Feb 13, 2023, 4:02 p.m.
Adrienne A. Harris, superintendent of the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS)
Adrienne A. Harris, superintendent of the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS)

Paxos Trust Company’s administration of Binance’s stablecoin left it open to use by bad actors, the New York Department of Financial Services told Reuters on Monday.

Paxos "violated its obligation to conduct tailored, periodic risk assessments and due diligence refreshes of Binance and Paxos-issued BUSD customers to prevent bad actors from using the platform," a spokesman with the regulator told Reuters, saying the token wasn’t being administered in a “safe and sound” manner.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the State of Crypto Newsletter today. See all newsletters

The state’s financial regulators had previously ordered Paxos to halt its issuance of Binance USD. The NYDFS said it had instructed Paxos to cease minting the stablecoin due to several unresolved issues related to Paxos’ oversight of its relationship with Binance. Paxos said it is ceasing its relationship with Binance for BUSD.

CoinDesk first reported last week that the New York regulator was investigating Paxos.

Read More: BUSD Depegs From Rival Stablecoin Tether After New York Regulator Tells Paxos to Stop Minting New Tokens

More For You

Accelerating Convergence Between Traditional and On-Chain Finance in 2026?

Más para ti

U.S.-based DeFi group urges UK FCA to anchor crypto rules to 'unilateral control'

UK FCA (FCA, modified by CoinDesk)

DeFi Education Fund says developers of non-custodial protocols should not be regulated as intermediaries under the U.K.’s proposed crypto regime.

Lo que debes saber:

  • The DeFi Education Fund tells FCA that regulatory obligations should apply only where there is “unilateral control” over user assets or transactions.
  • The U.S.-based group argues non-custodial DeFi developers should not be treated like centralized intermediaries.
  • DEF warns that applying trading platform and prudential requirements and full money-laundering laws to automated protocols would be structurally incompatible.