Share this article

Bitcoin, Stablecoins the Worst Options for Cross-Border Payments, ECB Study Says

A senior central banker said state-backed digital currencies would be quicker and cheaper.

Updated Apr 9, 2024, 11:38 p.m. Published Aug 2, 2022, 12:41 p.m.
CBDCs would be better than bitcoin or stablecoins at speeding up cross-border payments, a European Central Bank study says. (Raimund Linke/Getty Images)
CBDCs would be better than bitcoin or stablecoins at speeding up cross-border payments, a European Central Bank study says. (Raimund Linke/Getty Images)

Bitcoin and stablecoins are the worst of all options for cutting the cost and time associated with cross-border payments, a study published by the European Central Bank Monday said.

Spurred by private-sector initiatives like the now defunct Facebook-backed Libra, regulators are looking at how to tighten up the clunky payments networks that can leave people waiting days for their money, but central banks would rather be in the driving seat themselves.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the State of Crypto Newsletter today. See all newsletters

“The holy grail of cross-border payments is a solution allowing cross-border payments to be immediate, cheap, universal and settled in a secure settlement medium,” said the study, which was co-authored by Ulrich Bindseil, the ECB's director-general for market infrastructure and payments.

“Bitcoin is least credible” of the visions to achieve that, the report continued, and stablecoins – crypto assets that seek to tie their value to other assets such as fiat currencies – come in a close second given concerns over their market power.

The report says a bitcoin-based system wouldn’t work because of its “inherently inefficient” proof-of-work consensus mechanism, the “widespread” use for criminal purposes and the volatility of the asset. It also described the fervor of the cryptocurrency’s supporters as “quasi-religious.”

Read more: How Big Is Crypto Crime, Really?

There’s more mileage in linking together individual jurisdictions’ central bank-issued digital currencies (CBDCs), Bindseil wrote. although few CBDCs exist yet.

Those developing CBDCs – presumably including the ECB, which is considering a digital euro – should “discuss at a relatively early stage the related interoperability issues” to ensure they can work together with other currency zones, the study said.

They should also try to make existing domestic instant-payment systems operate with each other, despite questions over how to vet dirty money, and deal with counterparties who might default, it added.

Fabio Panetta, a member of the ECB’s executive board, has previously called crypto a “Ponzi scheme" that regulators should be "less tolerant" toward. The Bank for International Settlements, an association of major central banks, which previously revealed that nine in 10 central banks are working on a CBDC, in July called for greater cooperation among the banks.

More For You

KuCoin Hits Record Market Share as 2025 Volumes Outpace Crypto Market

16:9 Image

KuCoin captured a record share of centralised exchange volume in 2025, with more than $1.25tn traded as its volumes grew faster than the wider crypto market.

What to know:

  • KuCoin recorded over $1.25 trillion in total trading volume in 2025, equivalent to an average of roughly $114 billion per month, marking its strongest year on record.
  • This performance translated into an all-time high share of centralised exchange volume, as KuCoin’s activity expanded faster than aggregate CEX volumes, which slowed during periods of lower market volatility.
  • Spot and derivatives volumes were evenly split, each exceeding $500 billion for the year, signalling broad-based usage rather than reliance on a single product line.
  • Altcoins accounted for the majority of trading activity, reinforcing KuCoin’s role as a primary liquidity venue beyond BTC and ETH at a time when majors saw more muted turnover.
  • Even as overall crypto volumes softened mid-year, KuCoin maintained elevated baseline activity, indicating structurally higher user engagement rather than short-lived volume spikes.

More For You

Ukraine banned Polymarket and there’s no legal way for it to come back

Kyiv in Ukraine (Glib Albovsky/Unsplash/Modified by CoinDesk)

Polymarket and similar platforms are considered unlicensed gambling operators, leading to blocked access.

What to know:

  • Ukraine has no legal framework for Web3 prediction markets, and current legislation provides no recognition for such platforms.
  • Polymarket and similar platforms are considered unlicensed gambling operators, leading to blocked access.
  • Legal changes are unlikely in the near future, as Parliamentary revisions to gambling definitions are extremely improbable during wartime, leaving prediction markets in a legal deadlock.