DeFi Ledgers Can Help Regulators Oversee Sector, BIS Official Says
A new BIS working paper makes a case for "embedded supervision" that argues regulatory oversight can be built into seemingly untamable decentralized finance systems.
Decentralized finance (DeFi) can be regulated by relying on its own trust-creating mechanisms to collect compliance data, said Raphael Auer, head of the Bank for International Settlements' (BIS) Eurosystem Innovation Hub.
A working paper authored by Auer titled "Embedded supervision: How to build regulation into decentralized finance," published Wednesday, argues the compliance of DeFi players can be automatically monitored by "reading the market's ledger."
"This reduces the need for firms to actively collect, verify and deliver data," the paper said.
DeFi is a term used to describe a range of intermediary-free financial applications built on a blockchain. The applications are built on distributed ledgers used to record transactions and for verification purposes. Although it is often championed by the crypto world and Web 3 enthusiasts, DeFi has left regulators around the world sounding an alarm over the urgent need to supervise the space.
But aside from a 2021 quarterly review by the BIS, an umbrella group for central banks, that called "decentralization" in DeFi an "illusion," and argued that centralized points within DeFi could allow regulators ways into establishing control over the space, little practical headway has been made in establishing oversight.
The technology of embedded supervision, however, has attracted interest from policymakers. At the request of lawmakers, the European Commission, the executive arm of the European Union responsible for proposing new legislation, is currently preparing to charter a study on the potential impact of linking supervisory data applications to decentralized finance, as a precursor to potential further legislation.
But some have expressed skepticism about whether it is even possible to carry out such supervision on smart contracts where the code is unchangeable. Embedded supervision is "both nice to have and unworkable in practice," George Giaglis, professor at the University of Nicosia Department of Digital Innovation, told CoinDesk.
"You cannot enforce this at the protocol level. Unless you did something totally stupid like, you know, embedding code in smart contracts that would allow regulators to peer into transactions or something like that, which are things that cannot happen in practice," he said.
More For You
KuCoin Hits Record Market Share as 2025 Volumes Outpace Crypto Market

KuCoin captured a record share of centralised exchange volume in 2025, with more than $1.25tn traded as its volumes grew faster than the wider crypto market.
What to know:
- KuCoin recorded over $1.25 trillion in total trading volume in 2025, equivalent to an average of roughly $114 billion per month, marking its strongest year on record.
- This performance translated into an all-time high share of centralised exchange volume, as KuCoin’s activity expanded faster than aggregate CEX volumes, which slowed during periods of lower market volatility.
- Spot and derivatives volumes were evenly split, each exceeding $500 billion for the year, signalling broad-based usage rather than reliance on a single product line.
- Altcoins accounted for the majority of trading activity, reinforcing KuCoin’s role as a primary liquidity venue beyond BTC and ETH at a time when majors saw more muted turnover.
- Even as overall crypto volumes softened mid-year, KuCoin maintained elevated baseline activity, indicating structurally higher user engagement rather than short-lived volume spikes.
More For You
Ukraine banned Polymarket and there’s no legal way for it to come back

Polymarket and similar platforms are considered unlicensed gambling operators, leading to blocked access.
What to know:
- Ukraine has no legal framework for Web3 prediction markets, and current legislation provides no recognition for such platforms.
- Polymarket and similar platforms are considered unlicensed gambling operators, leading to blocked access.
- Legal changes are unlikely in the near future, as Parliamentary revisions to gambling definitions are extremely improbable during wartime, leaving prediction markets in a legal deadlock.












