Share this article

Madison Cawthorn Hit With US House Ethics Investigation Over Crypto Promotion

The probe, announced Monday, appears to be related to the “Let’s Go Brandon” meme coin.

Updated May 11, 2023, 4:40 p.m. Published May 23, 2022, 6:43 p.m.
Rep. Madison Cawthorn (R-N.C.) speaks during a press conference on Nov. 1, 2021, in Washington, D.C. (Pete Marovich/Getty Images)
Rep. Madison Cawthorn (R-N.C.) speaks during a press conference on Nov. 1, 2021, in Washington, D.C. (Pete Marovich/Getty Images)

An alleged pump-and-dump of the “Let’s Go Brandon” meme coin by Rep. Madison Cawthorn (R-N.C.) appears to have sparked an investigation by the U.S. House of Representatives.

In a press release Monday, the House Committee on Ethics announced an investigation into whether Cawthorn “improperly promoted a cryptocurrency in which he may have had an undisclosed financial interest.”

STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the State of Crypto Newsletter today. See all newsletters

The investigation follows reports that Cawthorn owned and promoted the Let’s Go Brandon token one day before it announced a partnership with NASCAR driver Brandon Brown. “Let’s Go Brandon” has become right-wing shorthand for “F*** Joe Biden.”

“LGB legends. ... Tomorrow we go to the moon!,” Cawthone told his Instagram followers the night prior to that announcement, according to the Washington Examiner. (The token did indeed rocket on the news. It has since cratered.)

A controversial congressman with few allies left even in the Republican Party, Cawthorn’s alleged insider trading prompted calls for a congressional ethics investigation by Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.).

The investigation will have to move quickly: Cawthorn, who lost his primary race, will exit Congress at the end of the year.

More For You

More For You

Crypto group counters Wall Street bankers with its own stablecoin principles for bill

The White House, the executive office of the U.S. President (Jesse Hamilton/CoinDesk)

After the bankers shared a document at the White House demanding a total ban on stablecoin yield, the crypto side answers that it needs some stablecoin rewards.

What to know:

  • The U.S. Senate's crypto market structure bill has been waylaid by a dispute over something that's not related to market structure: yield on stablecoins.
  • The Digital Chamber is offering a response to a position paper circulated earlier this week by bankers who oppose stablecoin yield.
  • The crypto group's own principles documents argues that certain rewards are needed on stablecoin acvitity, but that the industry doesn't need to pursue products that directly threaten bank deposits business.