Crypto Popularity Could Pose Stability Risk, EU Watchdog Warns, as It Ponders New Powers
Fintech firms could face bank-style lending caps to stop crypto markets overheating, the European Systemic Risk Board said.

European Union banks could face stricter limits on their crypto holdings to prevent the burgeoning market in virtual assets upending the financial system, the bloc’s financial-stability watchdog said.
“The entry of new institutions and the use of new financial products, some of which have quickly gained popularity (e.g., crypto assets, stablecoins, etc.), has the potential to pose risks to financial stability,” the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) said in a concept note published Thursday.
The ESRB, set up after the 2008 crisis and chaired by European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde, is considering whether to extend the controls supervisors can impose to protect the EU's financial system. As well as monitoring individual institutions, regulators can impose “macroprudential” measures to limit larger problems, for example, to ensure that banks can’t give mortgages that are too generous compared with a borrower’s salary and calm overheating housing markets.
The ESRB suggested that those tools should extend beyond banking into other institutions, including new financial technology players, and large companies such as Meta (FB) and Alphabet's (GOOG) Google.
The ESRB also called for “quick adoption and implementation” of the EU’s Markets in Crypto Assets Regulation (MiCA), which it said would help control financial stability risks. Late-stage negotiations between the European Parliament and national governments on the rules begin Thursday.
In a November consultation that closed recently, the European Commission asked whether supervisors need extra powers to tackle the financial stability risks of crypto-based products and competitive pressures from the potential arrival of new fintech participants.
Fuller advice on that question is due from the ESRB “in the coming weeks,” it said today. So far the commission’s idea has got a mixed reception from among the EU’s 27 member countries.
In a letter dated March 17, Swedish authorities said it wasn’t clear if existing rules were enough to tackle crypto risks. Just four days later, the Italian central bank suggested keeping the focus on more traditional policies that look at individual banks, as crypto exposures are “currently tiny ... the use of crypto assets for payments is limited to niche groups."
International standard setters, aided by the ECB, are also looking at how much lending banks should be allowed to conduct against their crypto holdings. An initial proposal made by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, the global standard-setter for banking regulation, last year was rejected following criticism from the financial sector that it was too cautious, in effect ruling out any incentive for banks to get into the market.
More For You
KuCoin Hits Record Market Share as 2025 Volumes Outpace Crypto Market

KuCoin captured a record share of centralised exchange volume in 2025, with more than $1.25tn traded as its volumes grew faster than the wider crypto market.
What to know:
- KuCoin recorded over $1.25 trillion in total trading volume in 2025, equivalent to an average of roughly $114 billion per month, marking its strongest year on record.
- This performance translated into an all-time high share of centralised exchange volume, as KuCoin’s activity expanded faster than aggregate CEX volumes, which slowed during periods of lower market volatility.
- Spot and derivatives volumes were evenly split, each exceeding $500 billion for the year, signalling broad-based usage rather than reliance on a single product line.
- Altcoins accounted for the majority of trading activity, reinforcing KuCoin’s role as a primary liquidity venue beyond BTC and ETH at a time when majors saw more muted turnover.
- Even as overall crypto volumes softened mid-year, KuCoin maintained elevated baseline activity, indicating structurally higher user engagement rather than short-lived volume spikes.
More For You
Ukraine banned Polymarket and there’s no legal way for it to come back

Polymarket and similar platforms are considered unlicensed gambling operators, leading to blocked access.
What to know:
- Ukraine has no legal framework for Web3 prediction markets, and current legislation provides no recognition for such platforms.
- Polymarket and similar platforms are considered unlicensed gambling operators, leading to blocked access.
- Legal changes are unlikely in the near future, as Parliamentary revisions to gambling definitions are extremely improbable during wartime, leaving prediction markets in a legal deadlock.










