Share this article

Bank of Korea: CBDCs Are Fiat Currency Not Virtual Assets

Some legal changes would be needed before a potential central bank digital currency launch in South Korea, research indicates.

Updated Sep 14, 2021, 12:08 p.m. Published Feb 8, 2021, 3:13 p.m.
Bank of Korea
Bank of Korea

The Bank of Korea (BOK) has published the results of research it conducted last year on the legal issues surrounding central bank digital currencies (CBDC).

STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the State of Crypto Newsletter today. See all newsletters

The research concludes that a CBDC would meet the requirements of currency legislation and could be freely exchanged with cash as the two share the same legal status. Therefore it would be reasonable to treat a CBDC in the same way as cash deposits held by financial institutions, CoinDesk Korea reported Monday.

For this reason, it is proposed the BOK, South Korea's central bank, should have the legal basis for applying positive or negative interest rates on a future CBDC. It will also need to be decided whether the BOK would exchange the CBDC for cash with consumers directly or via an intermediary agency.

Considering how a CBDC would fit into South Korea’s existing legal framework, the research suggests it would not be subject to the Financial Transactions Act, as a CBDC issuance would be based on monetary authority and not for profit.

However, the research emphasizes the Bank of Korea Act would need to be amended to accommodate the issuance of a digital currency, because the act only accounts for notes and coins at present.

See also: S. Korea’s Central Bank Forms Legal Panel to Advise on Possible Digital Currency Launch

Comparison with virtual assets such as cryptocurrencies, according to the research, are difficult as a CBDC “has a clear issuer," the central bank, and is based on the exclusive power of that issuer. This differs from virtual assets which are described as digital certificates with economic value that can be traded or transferred electronically.

Therefore, as the CBDC would not be considered as property, the law would not be able to establish crime such as theft, embezzlement or stolen property. However, given that electronic records are defined as objects of property, it would be possible to apply laws relating to robbery, fraud, intimidation and damage.

More For You

More For You

Crypto group counters Wall Street bankers with its own stablecoin principles for bill

The White House, the executive office of the U.S. President (Jesse Hamilton/CoinDesk)

After the bankers shared a document at the White House demanding a total ban on stablecoin yield, the crypto side answers that it needs some stablecoin rewards.

What to know:

  • The U.S. Senate's crypto market structure bill has been waylaid by a dispute over something that's not related to market structure: yield on stablecoins.
  • The Digital Chamber is offering a response to a position paper circulated earlier this week by bankers who oppose stablecoin yield.
  • The crypto group's own principles documents argues that certain rewards are needed on stablecoin acvitity, but that the industry doesn't need to pursue products that directly threaten bank deposits business.