Tron Says Protestors at Beijing Office Invested in Imposter Scheme
The price of Tron tanked Monday on inaccurate rumors of a "police raid" at the company's office in Beijing. The real story was more interesting.

The price of Tron dropped precipitously Monday on inaccurate rumors of a "police raid" at the company's office in Beijing. The real story, however, was far more interesting.
According to an official company post, the police arrived to protect the office from "people [who] were deceived by the so-called 'Wave Field Super Community,'" a group that used the "Chinese-language version of TRON’s name to defraud investors." The victims called Tron itself a scam and cited the alleged suicide earlier this month of one investor in Wave Field Super Community.
"The victims had been promised high rates of return on their investments in the name of TRON, BitTorrent and uTorrent," the company wrote.
The bilked investors also stormed the wrong place. According to Tron, they approached the office of Raybo Technologies, a Tron affiliate that seems to have filed a number of U.S. trademarks for various Tron-related phrases.
"TRON officials expressed their sympathy and understanding for those who had been deceived, however, the company strongly condemns acts of violence that may be perpetrated as a result of events that are not in its direct control," the company wrote.
Context: ponzi scheme that borrowed Tron's name defrauded investors out of ~$145M USD. Guy in the video is requesting @justinsuntron to clarify whether the scam has anything to do with him.https://t.co/59gBKFOTpF
— Jason Choi (@mrjasonchoi) July 8, 2019
Tron CEO Justin Sun responded on Twitter:
#TRON partner office operating normally after Wave Field Community protesters disrupt morning operations, resulting in police presence. Continued sympathy for those defrauded; working with police to try to help. #TRX $TRX https://t.co/XGkCPjjdl1
— Justin Sun 🅣🌞 (@justinsuntron) July 8, 2019
The Wave Field Super Community has been running since January 2019 and banked on its name's similarity to Tron's use of the phrase "Wave Field" in China. The alleged Ponzi scheme promised massive returns and claimed to be investing in "Tron, BitTorrent, and uTorrent."
The group pretended to be a Tron "Super Representative," essentially an important node on the network, a claim that Tron never confirmed. The site closed suddenly on July 1, leading to mass confusion. Users of the Chinese microblogging site Weibo circulated what appeared to be a suicide note by a woman named Xia Bing, who claimed to have borrowed money to invest in the scheme. The note first appeared on a site called Nuclear Finance in China.
Even with the "raid" rumors debunked, Tron's price has yet to fully recover.

Tron image via Shutterstock.
Más para ti
Protocol Research: GoPlus Security

Lo que debes saber:
- As of October 2025, GoPlus has generated $4.7M in total revenue across its product lines. The GoPlus App is the primary revenue driver, contributing $2.5M (approx. 53%), followed by the SafeToken Protocol at $1.7M.
- GoPlus Intelligence's Token Security API averaged 717 million monthly calls year-to-date in 2025 , with a peak of nearly 1 billion calls in February 2025. Total blockchain-level requests, including transaction simulations, averaged an additional 350 million per month.
- Since its January 2025 launch , the $GPS token has registered over $5B in total spot volume and $10B in derivatives volume in 2025. Monthly spot volume peaked in March 2025 at over $1.1B , while derivatives volume peaked the same month at over $4B.
Más para ti
Tom Lee responds to controversy surrounding Fundstrat’s differing bitcoin outlooks

A debate on X over seemingly conflicting bitcoin forecasts from Fundstrat analysts drew a response from Tom Lee, highlighting differing mandates and time horizons.
Lo que debes saber:
- X users flagged what appeared to be conflicting bitcoin outlooks from Fundstrat’s Tom Lee and Sean Farrell.
- Lee endorsed a post arguing the views reflect different mandates and time horizons, not internal disagreement.
- The episode highlights how public commentary can blur distinctions between short-term risk management and long-term macro views.











