UK Telecom Regulator Wins Grant to Study Blockchain
The U.K.'s communications regulator, Ofcom, received £700,000 to study potentially using blockchain in managing the nation's 1 billion phone numbers.

The U.K. is sponsoring research into organizing and managing phone numbers by the national telecom regulator.
The Regulators' Pioneer Fund announced on Friday that it would award nearly £700,000 (just under $915,000) to Ofcom, the national telecommunications regulatory authority, "for a project that uses blockchain technology to improve U.K. telephone number management."
Ofcom provided more details about the project Monday, saying in a press release that there are roughly 1 billion phone numbers available to U.K. residents, "either already in use or reserved for allocation."
"We issue blocks of these numbers to telecoms operators, who manage the numbers and movement (porting) of them into and out of their control," it explained.
However, as the country moves from traditional analog phone lines to an internet-based infrastructure, current systems may face issues. As such, blockchain technology could be used to lower costs, make porting more efficient, streamline fraud or "nuisance" call management and provide customers with a better experience.
Ofcom chief technology officer Mansoor Hanif said in a statement that the regulator would work with industry members, explaining:
"We will be working with industry to explore how blockchain could make it quicker and easier for landline customers to switch providers while keeping their number – as well as reducing nuisance calls. And we'll expand our research into other areas where innovative technologies such as blockchain could be applied to benefit consumers."
The entity has been looking to develop a new database to create these improvements, but past attempts have failed, the release explained.
In particular, centralized databases are expensive and put up "barriers to collaboration," but a blockchain platform "offers an opportunity to build a cost-effective and future-proof solution."
Any solution built as a result of the project will be tested prior to an industry rollout, the release noted. Further, the regulators intend to "share key learnings, best practices, and the underlying code base, where applicable, with other regulators."
British telephone booth image via Shutterstock
More For You
KuCoin Hits Record Market Share as 2025 Volumes Outpace Crypto Market

KuCoin captured a record share of centralised exchange volume in 2025, with more than $1.25tn traded as its volumes grew faster than the wider crypto market.
What to know:
- KuCoin recorded over $1.25 trillion in total trading volume in 2025, equivalent to an average of roughly $114 billion per month, marking its strongest year on record.
- This performance translated into an all-time high share of centralised exchange volume, as KuCoin’s activity expanded faster than aggregate CEX volumes, which slowed during periods of lower market volatility.
- Spot and derivatives volumes were evenly split, each exceeding $500 billion for the year, signalling broad-based usage rather than reliance on a single product line.
- Altcoins accounted for the majority of trading activity, reinforcing KuCoin’s role as a primary liquidity venue beyond BTC and ETH at a time when majors saw more muted turnover.
- Even as overall crypto volumes softened mid-year, KuCoin maintained elevated baseline activity, indicating structurally higher user engagement rather than short-lived volume spikes.
More For You
Here’s why bitcoin’s is failing its role as a 'safe haven' versus gold

Bitcoin behaves more like an "ATM" during uncertain times, with investors quickly selling it to raise cash.
What to know:
- During recent geopolitical tensions, Bitcoin lost 6.6% of its value, while gold rose 8.6%, demonstrating bitcoin's vulnerability in times of market stress.
- Bitcoin behaves more like an "ATM" during uncertain times, with investors quickly selling it to raise cash, contrary to its reputation as a stable digital asset.
- Gold remains the preferred hedge for short-term risks, while bitcoin is better suited for long-term monetary and geopolitical uncertainties that unfold over years.











