Share this article

How Bitcoin and XRP Traders Are Positioning Themselves in a Choppy Market Environment

Large traders are employing divergent options strategies in a directionless market.

Updated Nov 13, 2025, 1:51 p.m. Published Nov 13, 2025, 9:28 a.m.
Traders looking at the screen. (This_is_Engineering/Pixabay)
What strategies are traders employing. (This_is_Engineering/Pixabay)

What to know:

  • Large BTC traders are employing non-directional options strategies like strangles and straddles to navigate market volatility.
  • Latest XRP block flow points to bias for volatility compression.

In a market characterized by choppy price action and uncertainty, large traders of major cryptocurrencies are quietly taking divergent paths.

While bitcoin investors are bracing for volatility with non-directional option plays, some XRP traders are betting on the opposite, recent block trades on crypto options exchange Deribit show.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the Crypto Daybook Americas Newsletter today. See all newsletters

Over the past week, strangles accounted for 16.9% of bitcoin option blocks traded on the platform, while straddles made up 5%. Both are non-directional volatility strategies, betting on significant price moves, whether up or down. XRP traders, in contrast, shorted strangles, in effect betting against increased volatility.

A strangle involves buying out-of-the-money (OTM) call and put options with the same expiry but different strike prices equidistant from the spot price, offering a cost-effective way to profit from large swings. For instance, if the spot price is $104,700, then the simultaneous purchase of the $105,000 call and the $104,400 put constitutes a long strangle.

A straddle involves purchases of at-the-money call and put options at the same strike price, resulting in a higher initial cost but greater sensitivity to volatility.

Both strategies can lose the premiums paid if the anticipated volatility does not materialize. Note that the bet here is on volatility, and does not necessarily imply a bullish or bearish price outlook.

According to Deribit CEO Luuk Strijers, taken together these non-directional BTC strategies exceed 20% of total block flows, an unusually high figure.

"This suggests a market grappling with uncertainty, where traders anticipate significant price moves but remain unsure about the direction," Strijers told CoinDesk.

Block option trades are large, privately negotiated transactions involving significant quantities of options contracts, typically executed outside of the open market to minimize their impact on price. They are primarily conducted by institutional investors or large traders and enable the discreet execution of sizable positions without triggering market volatility or revealing trading intentions prematurely.

The preference for non-directional strategies underscores why the crypto options market has been flourishing: It enables traders to speculate on volatility along with price direction, facilitating more efficient risk management.

Breakdown of weekly BTC options block trades. (Deribit)
Breakdown of weekly BTC options block trades. (Deribit)

Deribit's BTC options market is worth over $44 billion in terms of notional open interest, offering crypto traders the most liquid avenue to hedge risk and speculate.

The ether market is worth over $9 billion and has featured a bias for a put diagonal spread over the past week.

That is best categorized as a directional-to-neutral strategy that profits from time (theta) decay while also having a positive exposure to implied volatility. In other words, while it is not purely a volatility play, volatility does have a role in its profit potential.

In ETH's case, straddles and strangles cumulatively accounted for just over 8% of the total block flow over the past week.

Bet on XRP rangeplay

Deribit’s XRP options market remains relatively small, with a notional open interest of around $67.6 million. Block trades are infrequent, but tend to be sizable enough to capture market attention when they occur.

For example, on Wednesday, a short strangle trade on XRP was executed over the OTC desk at Paradigm and subsequently booked on Deribit. The trade involved selling 40,000 contracts each of the $2.2 call and $2.6 put options expiring on Nov. 21, representing 80,000 XRP at an average premium of 0.0965 USDC.

A short strangle is a bet on volatility compression and the trader behind the short strangle is betting that macro jitters are priced in, according to Deribit's Asia business development head, Lin Chen.

"Crypto volatility remains broadly elevated amid a wider risk-off sentiment driven by macro uncertainties, including the U.S. government shutdown and reopening dynamics as well as expectations around a December rate cut," Chen said in an interview. "XRP’s at-the-money implied volatility has surged above 80%, reflecting this heightened uncertainty.

"The trader is effectively betting that these macro risks are now fully priced in. Their view is that XRP will remain range-bound between $2.2 and $2.6, and the yield on selling the strangle looks particularly attractive," Chen added.

Shorting a strangle can be a costly strategy if volatility unexpectedly surges, potentially leading to unlimited losses as the underlying price moves sharply beyond the strike prices.

Because of this significant risk, short strangles are generally considered high-risk trades unsuitable for most retail investors unless they have robust risk management and a high tolerance for potential drawdowns.

More For You

Accelerating Convergence Between Traditional and On-Chain Finance in 2026?

More For You

Ark Invest's Cathie Wood says bitcoin will thrive amid ‘deflationary chaos’ created by AI and innovation

Ark Invest CEO Cathie Wood in a conversation with ProCap Financial CEO Anthony Pompliano at the Bitcoin Investor Week in New York. (CoinDesk)

Exponential tech will force down prices and stress legacy finance, for which bitcoin offers a trustless alternative, said Wood at Bitcoin Investor Week.

What to know:

  • Cathie Wood argues that bitcoin is a hedge not only against inflation but also against a coming wave of technology-driven, productivity-led deflation.
  • She says rapid cost declines in artificial intelligence and other exponential technologies will trigger "deflationary chaos" that traditional financial institutions and the Federal Reserve are unprepared for.
  • In her view, bitcoin’s decentralized design and fixed supply make it a safer alternative to fragile, debt-based financial systems that could be strained by deflation and disrupted business models.