Share this article

Polymarket, UMA Communities Lock Horns After $7M Ukraine Bet Resolves

The bet was resolved as 'yes' despite no official agreement, leading to suspicions of manipulation by a large UMA token holder, but Polymarket defended the UMA voting process.

Updated Mar 27, 2025, 12:02 p.m. Published Mar 27, 2025, 12:01 p.m.
Ukraine (Unsplash)
Ukraine (Unsplash)

What to know:

  • A controversial $7 million bet on Polymarket, a prediction platform, over a potential Ukraine-U.S. mineral deal has caused a rift between Polymarket and UMA communities.
  • The bet was resolved as 'yes' despite no official agreement, leading to suspicions of manipulation by a large UMA token holder, but Polymarket defended the UMA voting process.
  • Polymarket acknowledged the premature resolution and is seeking community input for preventing similar issues, promising clearer rules and updates, though specifics are yet to be announced.

A contentious $7 million bet on prediction platform Polymarket has sparked disagreement between the Polymarket and UMA communities.

The bet, which speculated on whether Ukraine would agree to a mineral deal with U.S. President Donald Trump before April, saw its "yes" probability surge from 9% to 100% between March 24 and 25, despite no official agreement being reached.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the Crypto Daybook Americas Newsletter today. See all newsletters

Polymarket relies on UMA, an optimistic oracle system, to determine the outcomes of its prediction markets.

In this system, anyone can propose a resolution by staking a $750 USDC.e bond, which can then be challenged. If a dispute arises, UMA token holders vote to settle the matter.

In this case, the bet resolved as "yes," leading many users to suspect manipulation by a "UMA whale" — a holder of a large number of UMA tokens capable of influencing the vote.

Polymarket responded via its Discord server, admitting the resolution was unexpected but denying it constituted a "market failure" that would warrant refunds.

It clarified that the market was resolved too soon, as no deal between Ukraine and the U.S. has been confirmed, yet it stood by the UMA voting process to correct the outcome.

Polymarket has since turned to its community for suggestions on preventing future issues, promising clearer rules and forthcoming updates, though it has yet to detail specific changes.

Read more: Polymarket Suffers UMA Governance Attack After Rogue Actor Becomes Top-5 Token Staker

More For You

Protocol Research: GoPlus Security

GP Basic Image

What to know:

  • As of October 2025, GoPlus has generated $4.7M in total revenue across its product lines. The GoPlus App is the primary revenue driver, contributing $2.5M (approx. 53%), followed by the SafeToken Protocol at $1.7M.
  • GoPlus Intelligence's Token Security API averaged 717 million monthly calls year-to-date in 2025 , with a peak of nearly 1 billion calls in February 2025. Total blockchain-level requests, including transaction simulations, averaged an additional 350 million per month.
  • Since its January 2025 launch , the $GPS token has registered over $5B in total spot volume and $10B in derivatives volume in 2025. Monthly spot volume peaked in March 2025 at over $1.1B , while derivatives volume peaked the same month at over $4B.

More For You

DOT Sinks 2% After Breaking Key Support

"Polkadot price chart showing a 2.5% drop from $2.02 to $1.97 with increased trading volume."

The Polkadot token erased earlier gains amid elevated volume, falling from a high of $2.09 to $1.97.

What to know:

  • DOT collapsed through ascending trendline support around the $2.05 level on a massive 284% volume surge.
  • The token broke decisively below the support level to trade 2% lower over the last 24 hours.