Share this article
How MakerDAO's Stablecoin Survived the Crash, Smart Contract Bugs and Full Decentralization
How do DeFi stablecoins actually work and what happened during the sudden, precipitous drop in crypto prices earlier this month? On today's show Andreas M. Antonopoulos leads us through a very interesting system and how it survived 'Black Thursday'.
Updated Sep 14, 2021, 8:23 a.m. Published Mar 29, 2020, 2:16 p.m.
Make us preferred on Google
The best Sundays are for long reads and deep conversations. Last week the Let's Talk Bitcoin! Show gathered to discuss how the MakerDAO DeFi stablecoin actually works and what happened during the sudden, precipitous drop in crypto prices earlier this month.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the Crypto Daybook Americas Newsletter today. See all newsletters
Listen/subscribe to the CoinDesk Podcast feed for unique perspectives and fresh daily insight with Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Pocketcasts, Google Podcasts, Castbox, Stitcher, RadioPublica, IHeartRadio or RSS.
In the aftermath of the so-called "Black Thursday" crash from several weeks ago, MakerDAO's "DAI" ethereum-backed dollar-pegged stablecoin came untethered and was, for a time at least, functionally insolvent. In the aftermath, holders of the MKR token, which allows holders to participate in governance decisions opted to do a couple of things, including adding the centralized stablecoin USDC to the list of acceptable collateral, which drew both condemnations mostly around centralized risk being added to the system and praise for making the system more robust against sudden ETH collateral price crashes.
And now most recently, the Maker Foundation, which had held some centralized control over the protocol completed their long-planned exit with all authorities now transferred to the holders of MKR tokens, removing both a point of control that had been used as a safety check and a point of risk in that centralized control can be co-opted and used to disrupt a system as we've seen in other examples.
On today's show we're digging into:
- What is Decentralized Finance (DeFi)?
- How does decentralized finance differ from traditional banking?
- Fractional reserve versus over-collateralized loans
- Liberty Dollars’s missing collateral and USDC’s risky name
- MakerDAO, DAI dollar-pegged stablecoins and how this DeFi stablecoin actually works
- SDAI (Single Collateral DAI) vs. DAI (Multi Collateral DAI)
- Smart contract "vaults"
- Lending money to yourself: 150 percent, 300 percent, insurance and auctions
- What happened on "Black Thursday" as the price of ether dropped more than 50 percent
- What happened when transaction fees went through the roof
- A bug in the collateral auction smart contract
- A surprising crash: As the system became functionally insolvent the price of the dollar-pegged stablecoin actually went up
- Oasis.app vaults are transparent and pretty interesting, take a look!
- Loaning yourself money using your ether (at interest)
- How MakerDAO’s approach differs from SALT Lending
- The other half of the DAI system: saving vault smart contracts
- DAI Saving Rate (DSR) and the new certificate of deposit
- The reward for using MKR tokens to administer a good system
- Can savings vaults be liquidated?
- Smart contract risks, consensus risks, systemic risks and response time risks
- Sponsors: eToro.com and Purse.io
- What specifically went wrong with the auction smart contracts?
- Recapitalizing the system by diluting MKR governance stakeholders
- Even with bugs, market mechanisms to fill the solvency hole seemed to work better than government bailout equivalents
- Completing the transition from foundation-overseen to full tokenized governance
- Decentralization transition - A necessary step or a natural one?
- Single-collateral vs. Multi-collateral stablecoins
- Why would a decentralized stablecoin want to allow a centralized stablecoin for collateral?
- External political risks vs. internal technological risks
- “Life finds a way” and DeFi’s natural circuit breakers (also Mt. Gox)
- Whats the point of putting USDC in to get DAI out?
- How does DeFi stablecoin insurance work?
- A modular ecosystem
- How DeFi and traditional finance are similar
- DeFi vs. 2nd layer protocols
See also: Bailouts, Bitcoin, Disruption, Failures and Hope
Credits
Hosts: Adam B. Levine, Andreas M. Antonopoulos, Jonathan Mohan & Stephanie Murphy
Sponsors: eToro.com and Purse.io
Music: Jared Rubens and GurtyBeats
Editing: Jonas
Listen/subscribe to the CoinDesk Podcast feed for unique perspectives and fresh daily insight with Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Pocketcasts, Google Podcasts, Castbox, Stitcher, RadioPublica, IHeartRadio or RSS.
More For You
Pudgy Penguins is building a multi-vertical consumer IP platform — combining phygital products, games, NFTs and PENGU to monetize culture at scale.
What to know:
Pudgy Penguins is emerging as one of the strongest NFT-native brands of this cycle, shifting from speculative “digital luxury goods” into a multi-vertical consumer IP platform. Its strategy is to acquire users through mainstream channels first; toys, retail partnerships and viral media, then onboard them into Web3 through games, NFTs and the PENGU token.
The ecosystem now spans phygital products (> $13M retail sales and >1M units sold), games and experiences (Pudgy Party surpassed 500k downloads in two weeks), and a widely distributed token (airdropped to 6M+ wallets). While the market is currently pricing Pudgy at a premium relative to traditional IP peers, sustained success depends on execution across retail expansion, gaming adoption and deeper token utility.
More For You
Rollercoaster bitcoin price moves end up liquidating $1.7 billion in bullish crypto bets
More than $1.7 billion in leveraged positions were liquidated in 24 hours as bitcoin fell to $81,000, with long bets accounting for nearly all the damage amid macro jitters and Fed chair speculation.
What to know:
- More than $1.68 billion in leveraged crypto positions were liquidated in 24 hours, with about 267,000 traders forced out of trades.
- Long positions accounted for nearly 93 percent of the wipeout, led by roughly $780 million in bitcoin and $414 million in ether liquidations.
- Analysts say the sell-off was driven less by new bearish sentiment than by overcrowded leverage unwinding, flushing out speculative excess and reducing forced flows in the market.
Top Stories
