Share this article

U.S. Republican Lawmakers Say Crypto Legislation Not Yet Off the Table for This Year

Rep. Patrick McHenry and Sen. Cynthia Lummis said they're still shooting for crypto legislative action in the "lame duck" session after the November elections.

Updated Sep 18, 2024, 7:19 p.m. Published Sep 17, 2024, 4:40 p.m.
jwp-player-placeholder

Two of the leading U.S. lawmakers seeking crypto oversight legislation, Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.) and Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), are maintaining their position that a chance remains for a bill to clear Congress before the year is out.

That long-odds scenario would require some delicate maneuvering to get crypto matters attached to must-move legislation in the so-called lame-duck session of Congress after the elections but before the new members arrive for next year's session.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the State of Crypto Newsletter today. See all newsletters

"I really do think we're going to get something done in the lame duck," Lummis said at an event Tuesday hosted by Georgetown University's Psaros Center for Financial Markets and Policy. She said an effort still being pushed at the Senate Agricultural Committee could win a bipartisan handshake, then get amended in late-year negotiations to add other necessary details.

If the pursuit of wide-ranging U.S. regulation is delayed into the next congressional session, it'll probably be further pushed into late 2025, Lummis said. "We just can't wait anymore," she said. "Europe is way ahead of us."

McHenry, the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee who is set to retire after this session, led the strongest crypto legislative effort to date when he got a comprehensive digital assets bill through the House of Representatives this year. He said that effort – backed by 71 House Democrats, including several of the party's leaders – showed "substantial momentum" for a crypto bill.

He said legislation would probably have to be linked to a spending package that needs congressional approval this year. But he acknowledged that it might not work.

"There are seeds that you plant that may not grow in your timeframe," McHenry said, adding that the crypto sector now has "policy footprints that I've left in the sand" if the debate drags into another session. "Somebody else's name may be on it when it's signed into law."

Lummis also reiterated her view that the U.S. should start building a Bitcoin strategic reserve with a four-year buying program that she argues will turn into trillions in value in 20 years of holding onto the .

More For You

State of the Blockchain 2025

State of the Blockchain 16:9

L1 tokens broadly underperformed in 2025 despite a backdrop of regulatory and institutional wins. Explore the key trends defining ten major blockchains below.

What to know:

2025 was defined by a stark divergence: structural progress collided with stagnant price action. Institutional milestones were reached and TVL increased across most major ecosystems, yet the majority of large-cap Layer-1 tokens finished the year with negative or flat returns.

This report analyzes the structural decoupling between network usage and token performance. We examine 10 major blockchain ecosystems, exploring protocol versus application revenues, key ecosystem narratives, mechanics driving institutional adoption, and the trends to watch as we head into 2026.

More For You

ECB gains backing from Council of EU for caps on digital euro holdings

The EU seeks to put savings caps on the digital euro.

Concerned that a CBDC will drain funds from traditional banks, regulators are considering caps on how much digital euro citizens can hold to ensure it's purely for payments.

What to know:

  • The Council of the European Union supports the European Central Bank's plan for a digital euro, viewing it as an evolution of money and a tool for financial inclusion.
  • Limits on digital euro holdings are proposed to prevent the central bank digital currency from competing with bank deposits and to avoid financial instability.
  • Critics argue that these limits protect banks from competition and may restrict the digital euro's potential usefulness.