NFT Project Bored Ape Yacht Club Spawns ‘Left-Facing’ Copycats
The parody projects expose the absurdity of NFT communities and intellectual property concerns surrounding digital images.

It’s a Bored Ape face-off.
On Wednesday, two Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) parody projects gained momentum on crypto Twitter, igniting plagiarism accusations, several trading bans and a robust supply of ape-themed memes.
The two collections – both named PHAYC, a play on “fake” and “BAYC” – appear to be identical copies of the original BAYC collection, but with each ape’s profile mirrored to the opposite side, or “left-facing”.
One PHAYC collection’s Twitter bio read: “PHAYC IT TIL YOU MAKE IT.” The other read: “Apes phace left on the right side of History.”
Within hours, profile pictures boasting left-facing cartoon primates saturated crypto Twitter with members tweeting self-deprecating NFT humor.
“I think the project is a satirical take on the current state of NFTs and members of the NFT community who might be taking the NFT market a little too seriously,” said Twitter user @rootslashbin (“root”), a member of the PHAYC community.
right click save + flip > right click save
— 2PAYC SHAKUR (@2paycshakur) December 29, 2021
— 🅱️UY_JPEG (3,3) (@BUY_JPEG) December 29, 2021
Adding to the drama, the left-facing derivative project sporting Twitter handle @phunkyApeYC claimed to be the original left-facing derivative project, and not, as it might appear to the untrained eye, the left-facing derivative project with handle @phaycbot.
Since its launch in April 2021, BAYC has emerged as one of the most successful NFT projects, touting prominent celebrities, athletes and crypto-influencers as owners.
On NFT marketplace OpenSea, the floor price (the lowest price at which a non-fungible token can be purchased) of a Bored Ape stood at just under 60 ETH, or about $220,000.
I have just been informed that there is a copy cat #PHAYC that launched after us. Anybody else hear of this blasphemy?
— PAYC (@phunkyApeYC) December 30, 2021
PHAYC project @phunkyApeYC launched Tuesday evening as a free mint to the first 8,500 claimers and generated about 60 ETH from the remaining 1,496 sales.
PHAYC project @phaycbot started several hours later, hauling in 500 ETH in sales and offered no free mints. Rival project @phunkyApeYC subsequently bashed its copycat for copying and profiteering from the sale.
Both PHAYC projects sold out in several hours, but were subsequently banned on OpenSea for allegedly violating the platform’s intellectual-property policies. (After a scramble to get the projects relisted on other secondary markets, @phunkyApeYC is currently live on Mintable, while @phaycbot is available on Rarible.)
“Intellectual property laws seem to be in a very weird spot when it comes to NFTs and $200,000 price tags for pictures of cartoon apes is an odd reality to come to terms with even for someone who has been in the space for years,” Twitter user root told CoinDesk.
It is not uncommon for successful NFT projects to be imitated through what are essentially copy-and-paste jobs, but whether those projects have violated an unspoken “code of ethics” is still a point of contention in the NFT community.
In crypto, riding on the coattails of another successful project has proven to be a winning formula time and time again.
PHAYC it till you make it, as it were.
More For You
Protocol Research: GoPlus Security

What to know:
- As of October 2025, GoPlus has generated $4.7M in total revenue across its product lines. The GoPlus App is the primary revenue driver, contributing $2.5M (approx. 53%), followed by the SafeToken Protocol at $1.7M.
- GoPlus Intelligence's Token Security API averaged 717 million monthly calls year-to-date in 2025 , with a peak of nearly 1 billion calls in February 2025. Total blockchain-level requests, including transaction simulations, averaged an additional 350 million per month.
- Since its January 2025 launch , the $GPS token has registered over $5B in total spot volume and $10B in derivatives volume in 2025. Monthly spot volume peaked in March 2025 at over $1.1B , while derivatives volume peaked the same month at over $4B.
More For You
Tom Lee responds to controversy surrounding Fundstrat’s differing bitcoin outlooks

A debate on X over seemingly conflicting bitcoin forecasts from Fundstrat analysts drew a response from Tom Lee, highlighting differing mandates and time horizons.
What to know:
- X users flagged what appeared to be conflicting bitcoin outlooks from Fundstrat’s Tom Lee and Sean Farrell.
- Lee endorsed a post arguing the views reflect different mandates and time horizons, not internal disagreement.
- The episode highlights how public commentary can blur distinctions between short-term risk management and long-term macro views.











