Share this article
SEC Outlines Reasons for Reluctance to List Cryptocurrency ETFs
An SEC letter states there are "significant investor protection issues" to be examined before opening up crypto-ETFs to retail investors.
By Wolfie Zhao
Updated Sep 13, 2021, 7:23 a.m. Published Jan 19, 2018, 10:00 a.m.
Companies that wish to list exchange-traded fund (ETF) linked to cryptocurrencies may now find the approval process hindered by additional concerns from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), according to a staff letter issued by the regulator.
Responding to two investment associations on Jan. 18, the public letter is written by Dalia Blass, director at SEC's Division of Investment Management. While the division has seen growing interests from proponents of mutual funds and ETFs that hold value in cryptocurrencies, the letter states that there are "significant investor protection issues that need to be examined before sponsors begin offering these funds to retail investors."
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the Crypto Daybook Americas Newsletter today. See all newsletters
According to Blass, the agency's concerns mainly focus on five areas: valuation, liquidity, custody, arbitrage and potential manipulation. As the letter pointed out, for example, the SEC needs to evaluate how a cryptocurrency-related ETF can be fairly priced given the volatility of cryptocurrency prices, and amid technological changes such as blockchain forks.
In addition, liquidity remains another top issue that needs to be examined, in particular, how such innovative products can be redeemed by retail investors on a daily basis.
The letter states:
"Until the questions identified above can be addressed satisfactorily, we do not believe that it is appropriate for fund sponsors to initiate registration of funds that intend to invest substantially in cryptocurrency and related products, and we have asked sponsors that have registration statements filed for such products to withdraw them."
Blass' comments come following several recent filings with the SEC from firms seeking to list cryptocurrency-related ETFs. As reported by CoinDesk this month, some of these filings had been subsequently withdrawn, with the companies involved citing the regulator's concerns over valuation and liquidity.
, the SEC also rejected a request for a bitcoin-tied product proposed by noted bitcoin investors Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss.
SEC image via CoinDesk archive
More For You
L1 tokens broadly underperformed in 2025 despite a backdrop of regulatory and institutional wins. Explore the key trends defining ten major blockchains below.
What to know:
2025 was defined by a stark divergence: structural progress collided with stagnant price action. Institutional milestones were reached and TVL increased across most major ecosystems, yet the majority of large-cap Layer-1 tokens finished the year with negative or flat returns.
This report analyzes the structural decoupling between network usage and token performance. We examine 10 major blockchain ecosystems, exploring protocol versus application revenues, key ecosystem narratives, mechanics driving institutional adoption, and the trends to watch as we head into 2026.
More For You
Miner capitulation is a contrarian signal, indicates renewed bitcoin momentum, VanEck says
VanEck data shows declining bitcoin mining activity has historically preceded strong returns in bitcoin.
What to know:
- VanEck data shows that in the past 30 days bitcoin’s hashrate dropped by the most since April 2024
- Hashrate declines are historically aligned with miner capitulation and markets closer to local bottoms than tops.
- According to VanEck, periods of negative 90-day hashrate growth have delivered positive 180-day bitcoin returns 77% of the time.
Top Stories
