Share this article
Tron-Owned Video Platform Criticized for Hosting Extremists, US Capitol Rioters
A legal non-profit accuses the platform of failing to moderate accounts and allowing extremists to collect donations.
Updated Sep 14, 2021, 10:53 a.m. Published Jan 8, 2021, 10:38 a.m.
Make us preferred on Google
Video streaming platform DLive, owned by blockchain platform Tron, was reportedly used by far-right extremists to livestream the deadly riot at the U.S. Capitol building on Wednesday.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), a nonprofit legal organization, said on its Hatewatch blog Thursday that "white supremacists and neo-fascists" have taken to DLive as a streaming alternative to YouTube due to its lack of moderation.
SPLC said it identified five DLive accounts livestreaming the protests: "Baked Alaska," "Gloomtube," "Murder the Media," "Loulz" and "Woozuh." Baked Alaska members managed to breach the Capitol building, the post says.
The non-profit estimates that since DLive was founded it has allowed hundreds of thousands of dollars to be sent to such extremists through donations of cryptocurrency via a facility built into the site.
The platform also reaps rewards from the extremists' funding. DLive takes 25% from every donation, with 20% going to the platform itself and 5% is redistributed to other DLive users via its staking system, said SPLC.
On Wednesday, there was an unprecedented breach of the U.S. Capitol building as rioters supporting outgoing President Donald Trump stormed the building. The rioting left five people dead, including a Capitol police officer, and many wounded.
In December 2019, Tron founder Justin Sun announced his firm had struck an acquisition deal with DLive, moving the platform to the Tron Blockchain and integrating it with BitTorrent’s BLive streaming service.
See also: YouTube, Tron and the Dream of Decentralization
On Friday, soon after this article was published, DLive said in a post, "While we strongly advocate for the empowerment of our content creators, we also have zero tolerance towards any forms of violence and illegal activities."
Since Thursday, the platform said it has suspended three accounts, taken five channels offline, banned two accounts from livestreaming and permanently removed over 100 past broadcasts.
It's also taking action against streamers found to have been involved in the riots:
"The DLive team actively are taking actions regarding streamers who are found to be part of or participants in the incident at the Capitol Building in Washington, D.C. on January 6th including but not limited to account suspension, removal of past broadcasts, freezing their earnings and abilities to cash out. The donation and paid subscriptions will be refunded to the accounts from which they originated."
DLive further said it is now working on adding new reporting functions to help stop channels violating guidelines.
UPDATE (Jan. 8, 11:20 UTC): Updated with statements from DLive.
See also: Tron Blockchain Stalled for Hours by ‘Malicious Contract,’ Justin Sun Says
More For You
KuCoin captured a record share of centralised exchange volume in 2025, with more than $1.25tn traded as its volumes grew faster than the wider crypto market.
What to know:
- KuCoin recorded over $1.25 trillion in total trading volume in 2025, equivalent to an average of roughly $114 billion per month, marking its strongest year on record.
- This performance translated into an all-time high share of centralised exchange volume, as KuCoin’s activity expanded faster than aggregate CEX volumes, which slowed during periods of lower market volatility.
- Spot and derivatives volumes were evenly split, each exceeding $500 billion for the year, signalling broad-based usage rather than reliance on a single product line.
- Altcoins accounted for the majority of trading activity, reinforcing KuCoin’s role as a primary liquidity venue beyond BTC and ETH at a time when majors saw more muted turnover.
- Even as overall crypto volumes softened mid-year, KuCoin maintained elevated baseline activity, indicating structurally higher user engagement rather than short-lived volume spikes.
More For You
Ukraine banned Polymarket and there’s no legal way for it to come back
Polymarket and similar platforms are considered unlicensed gambling operators, leading to blocked access.
What to know:
- Ukraine has no legal framework for Web3 prediction markets, and current legislation provides no recognition for such platforms.
- Polymarket and similar platforms are considered unlicensed gambling operators, leading to blocked access.
- Legal changes are unlikely in the near future, as Parliamentary revisions to gambling definitions are extremely improbable during wartime, leaving prediction markets in a legal deadlock.
Top Stories
