Cryptopia Users Win Victory in Court Case Over Crypto Assets Worth Over $100M
In the fallout from a massive hack of the New Zealand cryptocurrency exchange, users at last have a little good news.

In the fallout from the New Zealand cryptocurrency exchange Cryptopia, users at last have a little good news.
In a court ruling over how the remaining crypto assets will be distributed, Justice David Gendall at the High Court in Christchurch said users of the exchange are entitled to the assets they hold in Cryptopia accounts, deciding they should be classed as "property" as they were held in separate trust accounts.
An alternative ruling would have seen the assets classed as normal debt to be distributed among both users and creditors.
Justice Gendall described the case in a document published on Wednesday, saying: "Effectively, the tussle which is before the Court is one between the creditors of Cryptopia on the one hand and the accountholders who have invested in the various digital assets (“the accountholders”) on the other."
Also read: ‘Ship-to-Ship’ Trade and Other Secrets of North Korea’s Illicit $1.5B Crypto Stash
The company had over 800,000 users with positive balances that would need to be reimbursed, but 37 creditors and 90 shareholders have also been vying for their stake in the remaining assets of the company.
Following the hack in January of last year, it was discovered Cryptopia had lost around NZ$30 million (US$17.85 million) in various cryptocurrencies – funds that are still missing with police still not having disclosed if they have any real suspects.
The breach left crypto assets worth around NZ$170 million (US$101 million) held by the exchange. Grant Thornton New Zealand, which was assigned to oversee the firm's liquidation process last May, is still trying to ascertain the details of which users held which cryptocurrencies due to poor record keeping at Cryptopia.
Also disclosed in the filing, creditors would likely end up with a share of other Cryptopia funds to the value of NZ$5.4 million (US$3.2 million). That's less than half of the claimed NZ$12.7 million (US$7.5 million), of which New Zealand's tax department also seeks NZ$5 million (US$2.9 million).
Also read: A New Ultrasonic Hack Can Exploit Your Siri
With lawyers representing the creditors and the exchange users both taking different stances on the key issue of whether the crypto assets are indeed property (the creditors said they are not), Justice Gendall ultimately said: "I reach the conclusion that the cryptocurrencies here situated in Cryptopia’s exchange are a species of intangible personal property and clearly an identifiable thing of value. Without question they are capable of being the subject matter of a trust."
"The argument that cryptocurrency is mere information and therefore it is not property is a simplistic one and, in my view, it is wrong in the present context," he added. "I dismiss it."
More For You
KuCoin Hits Record Market Share as 2025 Volumes Outpace Crypto Market

KuCoin captured a record share of centralised exchange volume in 2025, with more than $1.25tn traded as its volumes grew faster than the wider crypto market.
What to know:
- KuCoin recorded over $1.25 trillion in total trading volume in 2025, equivalent to an average of roughly $114 billion per month, marking its strongest year on record.
- This performance translated into an all-time high share of centralised exchange volume, as KuCoin’s activity expanded faster than aggregate CEX volumes, which slowed during periods of lower market volatility.
- Spot and derivatives volumes were evenly split, each exceeding $500 billion for the year, signalling broad-based usage rather than reliance on a single product line.
- Altcoins accounted for the majority of trading activity, reinforcing KuCoin’s role as a primary liquidity venue beyond BTC and ETH at a time when majors saw more muted turnover.
- Even as overall crypto volumes softened mid-year, KuCoin maintained elevated baseline activity, indicating structurally higher user engagement rather than short-lived volume spikes.
More For You
Ukraine banned Polymarket and there’s no legal way for it to come back

Polymarket and similar platforms are considered unlicensed gambling operators, leading to blocked access.
What to know:
- Ukraine has no legal framework for Web3 prediction markets, and current legislation provides no recognition for such platforms.
- Polymarket and similar platforms are considered unlicensed gambling operators, leading to blocked access.
- Legal changes are unlikely in the near future, as Parliamentary revisions to gambling definitions are extremely improbable during wartime, leaving prediction markets in a legal deadlock.











