NYDFS Chief Defends State Regulator's Crypto Approach
New York Department of Financial Services superintendent Maria Vullo defended regulators' actions in the crypto space during a panel discussion.

New York Department of Financial Services superintendent Maria Vullo defended her office's approach to regulating cryptocurrencies on Thursday.
Speaking at the Council on Foreign Relation's "Legal Tender? The Regulation of Cryptocurrencies" panel in New York on Wednesday, Vullo said that her view is "regulation in this space, just like any space where you have money transmission, [is necessary]," making a point she often revisited during the discussion.
While some state and federal regulars are taking time to create rules for the industry, "it certainly hasn't taken New York long to establish a framework" for regulating cryptocurrencies, Vullo said in her opening statement, referring to the state's controversial BitLicense.
The role of regulation in the cryptocurrency space was a contentious topic, with Blockchain president and chief legal officer Marco Santori claiming regulators should ease up on the over-regulation.
That said, he did acknowledge that "a lot of token sales run afoul of the spirit of the law, if not the letter of the law. But we have to be careful not to lump them all together."
In particular, he argued that New York's laws "have been an abject failure."
However, Vullo derided developers who claim that their work should allow them to launch token sales free of disclosure or other requirements, saying:
"I think regulators absolutely need to be in the space, I know they're saying 'we're innovative, we're startups, we need to be left alone and put in a sandbox.' Toddlers play in the sandbox. Adults play by the rules."
In another rapid exchange, CNN investigative journalist and panelist Jose Pagliery expressed concern about the idea that "code is law," saying that while this may be true, coders can modify certain protocols:
"If you're the executive at a bank, you have people to answer to … if you're one of a dozen coders around the world whose name no one knows and you're the one at the controls changing how this cryptocurrency works … we have to figure out how these people are held accountable."
Santori disagreed with this premise, saying "that is not only a bad question, you should feel bad for asking it."
In turn, Vullo said: "I didn't know this was about feelings."
Seema Mody, Jose Pagliery, Marco Santori and Maria Vullo image by Nikhilesh De for CoinDesk
More For You
Pudgy Penguins: A New Blueprint for Tokenized Culture

Pudgy Penguins is building a multi-vertical consumer IP platform — combining phygital products, games, NFTs and PENGU to monetize culture at scale.
What to know:
Pudgy Penguins is emerging as one of the strongest NFT-native brands of this cycle, shifting from speculative “digital luxury goods” into a multi-vertical consumer IP platform. Its strategy is to acquire users through mainstream channels first; toys, retail partnerships and viral media, then onboard them into Web3 through games, NFTs and the PENGU token.
The ecosystem now spans phygital products (> $13M retail sales and >1M units sold), games and experiences (Pudgy Party surpassed 500k downloads in two weeks), and a widely distributed token (airdropped to 6M+ wallets). While the market is currently pricing Pudgy at a premium relative to traditional IP peers, sustained success depends on execution across retail expansion, gaming adoption and deeper token utility.
More For You
Ripple-linked XRP drops 5%, opening downside risk toward $1.70

Traders are watching $1.80 as near-term support, with $1.87–$1.90 now the key resistance zone.
What to know:
- XRP dropped about 5 percent from $1.91 to near $1.80 as bitcoin’s pullback sparked broad risk-off selling across high-beta tokens.
- The slide accelerated once XRP broke below key support around $1.87 on heavy volume, erasing last week’s gains before buyers stepped in near the $1.78–$1.80 zone.
- Traders now view $1.80 as a crucial support level, with a sustained move back above roughly $1.87–$1.90 needed to signal a corrective pullback rather than the start of a deeper decline.











