Share this article
SEC Says Liquid Staking Doesn't Run Afoul of Securities Laws
The SEC's latest staff statement — which isn't binding guidance — addresses certain aspects of liquid staking.
Updated Aug 6, 2025, 2:16 p.m. Published Aug 5, 2025, 7:51 p.m.
Make us preferred on Google
What to know:
- Liquid staking, where participants deposit their cryptos into a third-party staking service provider to receive receipt tokens, does not require any securities law disclosures, the SEC said Tuesday.
- The new SEC staff statement signals how the agency is thinking about the issue and suggests that any crypto industry participant who follows the guidance will not be sued by the regulator.
Participants in liquid staking, including depositors and providers, do not need to worry about securities law disclosures, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission said in a staff statement on Tuesday.
The statement, published by the Division of Corporation Finance, is specific to liquid staking, where participants deposit "covered crypto assets" into a third-party staking protocol provider, which in turn provides receipt tokens to the depositors.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Liquid staking allows users to lock up tokens in proof-of-stake blockchains while still maintaining access to their funds through derivative tokens. These tokens can then be used for various DeFi activities. Currently, liquid staking across all blockchains has nearly $67 billion in total-value-locked (TVL), with $31.7 billion in Lido, according to DefiLlama data.
Tokens tied to a number of liquid staking protocols, including Lido, Jito and Rocket Pool, went up marginally after the SEC statement was published, but are still down on the day's trading, CoinGecko showed.
To be sure, the SEC had previously published another staff statement addressing other forms of staking. Similar to the previous statement, Tuesday's note on liquid staking is not the same as binding guidance from the Commissioners or regulations that have gone through the SEC's formal rulemaking process.
However, the new statement does signal how the agency is thinking about the issue and suggests that any crypto industry participant who follows the guidance will not be sued by the regulator.
Tuesday's statement is specific to what liquid staking providers do, "including their roles in connection with the earning and distribution of rewards, slashing, and the minting, issuing and redeeming of Staking Receipt Tokens," as well as other ancillary services. The main caveat is that the deposited crypto assets cannot be "part of or subject to an investment contract."
"In a Liquid Staking arrangement, the Liquid Staking Provider (whether a Node Operator or not) does not provide entrepreneurial or managerial efforts to Depositors for whom it provides this service," the statement said.
"These arrangements are similar to those discussed in the Protocol Staking Statement with respect to 'Custodial Arrangements.' The Liquid Staking Provider does not decide whether, when, or how much of a Depositor’s Covered Crypto Assets to stake and is simply acting as an agent in connection with staking the Covered Crypto Assets on behalf of the Depositor," the statement said.
Join the crypto policy conversation Sept. 10 in D.C. — Register now for CoinDesk: Policy & Regulation.
More For You
KuCoin captured a record share of centralised exchange volume in 2025, with more than $1.25tn traded as its volumes grew faster than the wider crypto market.
What to know:
- KuCoin recorded over $1.25 trillion in total trading volume in 2025, equivalent to an average of roughly $114 billion per month, marking its strongest year on record.
- This performance translated into an all-time high share of centralised exchange volume, as KuCoin’s activity expanded faster than aggregate CEX volumes, which slowed during periods of lower market volatility.
- Spot and derivatives volumes were evenly split, each exceeding $500 billion for the year, signalling broad-based usage rather than reliance on a single product line.
- Altcoins accounted for the majority of trading activity, reinforcing KuCoin’s role as a primary liquidity venue beyond BTC and ETH at a time when majors saw more muted turnover.
- Even as overall crypto volumes softened mid-year, KuCoin maintained elevated baseline activity, indicating structurally higher user engagement rather than short-lived volume spikes.
More For You
Ukraine banned Polymarket and there’s no legal way for it to come back
Polymarket and similar platforms are considered unlicensed gambling operators, leading to blocked access.
What to know:
- Ukraine has no legal framework for Web3 prediction markets, and current legislation provides no recognition for such platforms.
- Polymarket and similar platforms are considered unlicensed gambling operators, leading to blocked access.
- Legal changes are unlikely in the near future, as Parliamentary revisions to gambling definitions are extremely improbable during wartime, leaving prediction markets in a legal deadlock.
Top Stories
