Stablecoins, CBDCs Don't Present Inherent Risk to Financial Stability: Bank of England Executive Says
Christina Segal-Knowles played down concerns that the traditional banking model would be undermined.
Stablecoins and central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) don't pose an inherent risk to financial stability even if they displace bank deposits, a Bank of England (BoE) executive director said.
- A shift to wider use of stablecoins and CBDCs "does not inherently constitute a financial stability risk as long as it happens in an orderly manner," Christina Segal-Knowles, executive director of financial market infrastructure at the BoE, said in a speech Thursday.
- Segal-Knowles played down concerns that holding stablecoins and CBDCs would undermine the traditional banking model if consumers chose to use them rather than depositing their money into a commercial bank.
- "In fact, findings show that the implications of this in the long term for the ability of households and businesses to get a loan are relatively modest," she said, although she acknowledged there is some uncertainty about that.
- Stablecoins don't pose any new issues, Segal-Knowles said. They are similar in nature to traditional forms of private money that is deposited by consumers and businesses in commercial banks.
- "This means that we will hold them to standards similar to those applicable to existing private money. It doesn't matter what type of technology you're using or the legal form of the firm."
- The speech followed the release of a BoE discussion paper exploring stablecoins, which focused on the adoption of private money and difficulties that could be presented for monetary policy as well as the cost and availability of lending.
Read more: Basel Committee Proposes Banks Set Aside Capital to Cover Bitcoin Exposure
More For You
State of the Blockchain 2025

L1 tokens broadly underperformed in 2025 despite a backdrop of regulatory and institutional wins. Explore the key trends defining ten major blockchains below.
What to know:
2025 was defined by a stark divergence: structural progress collided with stagnant price action. Institutional milestones were reached and TVL increased across most major ecosystems, yet the majority of large-cap Layer-1 tokens finished the year with negative or flat returns.
This report analyzes the structural decoupling between network usage and token performance. We examine 10 major blockchain ecosystems, exploring protocol versus application revenues, key ecosystem narratives, mechanics driving institutional adoption, and the trends to watch as we head into 2026.
More For You
Bitcoin trails polar opposites, Gold and Copper, as the 'fear and AI' trade lifts tangible assets

Gold and copper have outperformed other major assets this year, with gold rallying more than copper.
What to know:
- Gold and copper have outperformed other major assets this year, with gold rallying more than copper.
- Bitcoin has underperformed, failing to attract both fear-driven and AI-driven investment, highlighting a shift towards tangible assets.
- The divergence in performance between gold and copper reflects market bets on both AI-driven growth and systemic financial fears.












