Share this article

SUI Plunges 6% Overnight Before Buyers Step in at $3.40 Support

Market volatility intensified as geopolitical tensions and protocol recovery efforts create conflicting signals for traders

May 30, 2025, 2:30 p.m.
SUI/USD chart (CoinDesk Data)

What to know:

  • SUI experienced dramatic overnight volatility, plunging from $3.59 to $3.38 before finding support and attempting recovery.
  • Cetus Protocol's recovery plan has been approved with over 90% of validators voting "yes" to return $162 million in frozen funds following last week's $223 million exploit.
  • Trade tensions between US and China have spooked markets, with reports of "stalled" negotiations contributing to risk-off sentiment across cryptocurrency markets.

The cryptocurrency market faces headwinds as geopolitical tensions and security concerns weigh on investor sentiment.

SUI's sharp overnight decline coincides with broader market uncertainty, though strong buyer interest emerged at support levels around $3.40-$3.42.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the Crypto Daybook Americas Newsletter today. See all newsletters

Meanwhile, the Sui community has rallied behind Cetus Protocol's recovery efforts following its recent hack, with validators overwhelmingly approving a plan to return frozen funds to affected users.

Technical Analysis Highlights

  • SUI-USD dropped precipitously from $3.59 to a low of $3.38 during the midnight hour with extraordinary volume (24.8M) - more than triple the average hourly trading activity.
  • The overall range of $0.225 (6.25%) demonstrates substantial market uncertainty, with price finding support at $3.40-$3.42 on high volume, suggesting strong buyer interest at these levels.
  • Following the sharp decline, SUI has established a recovery pattern, forming an ascending channel with resistance around $3.50, though momentum appears to be waning as evidenced by the recent rejection at $3.48 with increasing selling pressure.
  • Price action formed a descending channel from $3.48 to a low of $3.42, with notable support emerging at $3.43.
  • Volume spiked dramatically at 14:00, reaching 545,865 units—nearly 4x the hourly average—coinciding with a strong bounce from $3.43 to $3.44.
  • The subsequent rejection at $3.44 and retracement to $3.43 suggests the formation of a potential range-bound pattern, with immediate resistance at $3.44 and support at $3.43, indicating market indecision following the earlier sharp decline.

AI Disclaimer: Parts of this article were generated with the assistance from AI tools and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and adherence to our standards. For more information, see CoinDesk's full AI Policy.

More For You

Protocol Research: GoPlus Security

GP Basic Image

需要了解的:

  • As of October 2025, GoPlus has generated $4.7M in total revenue across its product lines. The GoPlus App is the primary revenue driver, contributing $2.5M (approx. 53%), followed by the SafeToken Protocol at $1.7M.
  • GoPlus Intelligence's Token Security API averaged 717 million monthly calls year-to-date in 2025 , with a peak of nearly 1 billion calls in February 2025. Total blockchain-level requests, including transaction simulations, averaged an additional 350 million per month.
  • Since its January 2025 launch , the $GPS token has registered over $5B in total spot volume and $10B in derivatives volume in 2025. Monthly spot volume peaked in March 2025 at over $1.1B , while derivatives volume peaked the same month at over $4B.

More For You

Tom Lee responds to controversy surrounding Fundstrat’s differing bitcoin outlooks

Fundstrat Global Advisors Head of Research Tom Lee (Photo by Ilya S. Savenok / Getty Images for BitMine)

A debate on X over seemingly conflicting bitcoin forecasts from Fundstrat analysts drew a response from Tom Lee, highlighting differing mandates and time horizons.

What to know:

  • X users flagged what appeared to be conflicting bitcoin outlooks from Fundstrat’s Tom Lee and Sean Farrell.
  • Lee endorsed a post arguing the views reflect different mandates and time horizons, not internal disagreement.
  • The episode highlights how public commentary can blur distinctions between short-term risk management and long-term macro views.