Share this article

Crypto VC Firm Pantera Used Silicon Valley Bank as a Custodian

A regulatory filing shows the shuttered bank as one of three custodians for Pantera’s funds.

Updated May 9, 2023, 4:10 a.m. Published Mar 10, 2023, 10:59 p.m.
Pantera Capital CEO Dan Morehead (Shutterstock/CoinDesk)
Pantera Capital CEO Dan Morehead (Shutterstock/CoinDesk)

Crypto-focused venture capital and investment giant Pantera Capital recently had assets with now-shuttered Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), according to a regulatory filing last month.

In a Form ADV dated Feb. 3, Pantera listed SVB as one of three custodians for its private funds alongside BitGo and the custodial service of crypto exchange Coinbase. The filing is a requirement for registered investment advisers.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the Crypto Daybook Americas Newsletter today. See all newsletters

CoinDesk reached out to Pantera for comment but had not received a response by publication time.

Pantera restructured its upper management last month after the departure of co-chief investment officer Joey Krug. The firm revealed in January that its liquid token fund lost 80% during 2022.

Read more: How Silvergate’s Crypto Collapse Differed From Silicon Valley Bank’s: No Bailout

More For You

To freeze or not to freeze: Satoshi and the $440 billion in bitcoin threatened by quantum computing

Bitcoin bus (Photo: Olivier Acuna/Modified by CoinDesk)

As quantum computing inches closer to reality, nearly 7 million bitcoin, including Satoshi Nakamoto’s 1 million coins, are potentially at risk.

What to know:

  • Quantum computers powerful enough to break Bitcoin's cryptography could expose roughly 7 million coins, including about 1 million attributed to Satoshi Nakamoto, worth an estimated $440 billion at current prices.
  • The Bitcoin community is split between preserving strict neutrality and immutability—letting quantum attackers claim vulnerable coins—and intervening through protocol changes such as burning or migrating at-risk coins to quantum-resistant addresses.
  • While some experts warn that recent research may accelerate the timeline for breaking current encryption, others argue the threat remains distant and can be addressed through engineering upgrades rather than drastic governance changes.