Coinbase Accuses U.S. SEC, FDIC of Improperly Blocking Document Requests
The U.S. crypto exchange wanted the SEC to give up documents on closed probes involving ether's status as a security, and its research contractor is now suing to get them.

- Coinbase, through an intermediary, is again taking U.S. regulators to court to argue about Freedom of Information Act requests.
- The U.S. crypto exchange is going after documents at the Securities and Exchange Commission that may reveal how it first began deciding what digital tokens the agency would consider as securities.
- The company's contractor, History Associates, is also suing the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. over letters sent to financial firms to ask them to pause crypto activities.
A research firm Coinbase contracted is suing the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and a federal banking agency, accusing them on Thursday of failing to produce documents under open-records laws that would shed light on the regulators' views on cryptocurrencies.
On behalf of the U.S. digital assets exchange, History Associates Inc. said it's been improperly rebuffed by the SEC and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. regarding documents that Coinbase contends should be available under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). At the SEC, Coinbase is seeking written communications in three closed cases for how the agency formally worked out what digital assets it thinks qualify as securities, including Ethereum's ether
Coinbase's representatives are swooping in with this legal challenge right on the heels of the SEC's indication that it's reportedly closed its review of "Ethereum 2.0" as a potential security, so the regulatory agency may have greater difficulty rejecting document requests based on ether being at the center of an ongoing enforcement matter.
The exchange is also seeking documents tied to two previously settled digital assets cases. One involves Zachary Coburn, who founded the EtherDelta platform that acted as a market for ether that the SEC deemed in a 2018 action to be "digital asset securities," and the other focused on Enigma MPC, a blockchain startup that in 2017 sold $45 million in ENG tokens that the SEC ruled were unregistered securities.
"We asked the SEC for documents about closed investigations to shed light on how the SEC views its newfound, sweeping (and unlawful) authority," Coinbase Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal said in a post on X (formerly Twitter). "One of those investigations, which only recently closed, focused on ETH, which the SEC publicly announced is not a security in 2018. And the other investigations have been closed for years. But the SEC stonewalled our requests."
The SEC has denied requests for information on those long-closed cases and the more recent ETH matter under FOIA's "exemption 7A" – the protection against revealing matters that could undermine its law enforcement efforts.
Spokespeople for the SEC and FDIC declined to comment on the lawsuits.
History Associates' suit against the FDIC argues the letters asking firms to pause digital assets business "are part of a deliberate and concerted effort by the FDIC and other financial regulators to pressure financial institutions into cutting off digital-asset firms from the banking system."
The lawsuits join a host of other legal clashes between Coinbase and U.S. financial regulators. It's currently in a fight with the SEC over the agency's accusations that it operates an illegal exchange that trades unregistered securities is among the industry's highest profile court battles that could ultimately determine the course of crypto in the U.S. Coinbase also sued the SEC seeking a court order that would force the regulator to issue guidance defining digital asset securities.
Coinbase has funded lawsuits against U.S. government entities before. In 2022 it backed a group of investors and developers – including some of its own employees – who sued the U.S. Treasury Department over its sanctions against crypto mixer Tornado Cash. That suit was ultimately unsuccessful in a federal court, though the plaintiffs appealed.
Read More: Coinbase Seeks to Take Core Question in U.S. SEC Case to Higher Court
More For You
Pudgy Penguins: A New Blueprint for Tokenized Culture

Pudgy Penguins is building a multi-vertical consumer IP platform — combining phygital products, games, NFTs and PENGU to monetize culture at scale.
What to know:
Pudgy Penguins is emerging as one of the strongest NFT-native brands of this cycle, shifting from speculative “digital luxury goods” into a multi-vertical consumer IP platform. Its strategy is to acquire users through mainstream channels first; toys, retail partnerships and viral media, then onboard them into Web3 through games, NFTs and the PENGU token.
The ecosystem now spans phygital products (> $13M retail sales and >1M units sold), games and experiences (Pudgy Party surpassed 500k downloads in two weeks), and a widely distributed token (airdropped to 6M+ wallets). While the market is currently pricing Pudgy at a premium relative to traditional IP peers, sustained success depends on execution across retail expansion, gaming adoption and deeper token utility.
More For You
Crypto faces fork in the road as Clarity Act support wavers, Bitwise says

The asset manager argued that without federal legislation, the industry has three years to become indispensable before political winds potentially shift.
What to know:
- Bitwise said in a blog post Monday that Polymarket odds for the Clarity Act have fallen from 80% to 50% following industry pushback.
- If the bill fails, Bitwise believes crypto must achieve mass adoption in stablecoins and tokenization to force a regulatory hand.
- The firm anticipates a sharp rally upon the bill's passage, while a failure would likely lead to a "slower ascent" tied to proven utility.











