Share this article

UK Needs Bespoke Legal Framework for Using Crypto as Collateral: Law Commission

The Commission, funded by the Ministry of Justice, also pushed for legislation to treat crypto as a new type of property in its latest set of recommendations.

Updated Jun 28, 2023, 9:07 a.m. Published Jun 27, 2023, 11:01 p.m.
The U.K. Law Commission wants crypto and NFTs to attract property law rights (Reinaldo Sture/Unsplash)
The U.K. Law Commission wants crypto and NFTs to attract property law rights (Reinaldo Sture/Unsplash)

The U.K. should create a tailored framework for using crypto as collateral, a Law Commission funded by the Ministry of Justice said in a Wednesday report.

The scope of such a regime would go beyond existing U.K. regulations for collateral arrangements for traditional finance, the commission told CoinDesk.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the State of Crypto Newsletter today. See all newsletters

The commission also doubled down on its previous call for the U.K. to treat crypto assets as a new type of property. It also wants the government to set up “a panel of industry-specific technical experts, legal practitioners, academics and judges” to advise courts on complex legal issues relating to digital assets.

The report was the result of what the Law Commission of England and Wales claimed was the first ever government-commissioned analysis in the U.K. on how existing legal frameworks can accommodate crypto and non-fungible tokens (NFTs). The independent body is made up of lawyers, judges and professors, and makes recommendations for law reform that the government could decide to take forward. The commission’s proposals don’t apply in Scotland or Northern Ireland, which have their own legal systems.

While the legal systems of England and Wales are well-placed to support the U.K. government’s attempts to bring crypto into the scope of existing legal frameworks, some areas may need specialized treatment to accommodate digital assets, the Commission said in a press statement shared with CoinDesk.

“The flexibility of the common law means that the legal system in England and Wales is well placed to adapt to this rapid growth,” said Professor Sarah Green, commissioner for commercial and common law in the statement. “Our recommendations for reform and development of the law therefore seek to solidify the legal foundation for digital assets.”

Collateral arrangements

Although existing laws in England and Wales provide options for the use of crypto as collateral, the commission said those options are “inadequate.”

“As such, we recommend that, as a matter of priority, the Government sets up a multi-disciplinary project to formulate and put in place a bespoke statutory legal framework that better and more clearly facilitates the entering into, operation and enforcement” of certain crypto collateral arrangements, the commission said.

Such a framework would need to be tailored to the way crypto works, from how assets are held, transferred and controlled, the body added.

For one, existing Financial Collateral Arrangement Regulations (FCAR), don’t apply if either party is an individual. But this limitation will need to be considered “given the level of individual participation” in crypto markets, the commission said.

The FCAR defines financial collateral as “cash, financial instruments or monetary claims of certain types,” while typical collateral arrangements include charges over deposits, lending of stocks and repo arrangements.

“What the Law Commission is proposing goes beyond crypto lending as it relates to using crypto as collateral for a range of arrangements,” it added. “The FCARs outlines a scope of arrangements where collateral can be used but we are not necessarily restricting as far as the FCARs.”

The Commission previously said its recommendations on crypto align with the Conservative administration’s plans to turn the U.K. into a hub for digital assets under Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s leadership.

“Our reputation for straight dealing, use of the English language and flexible common law attracts business across the world. This, combined with our straightforward approach to regulating crypto assets puts the U.K. at the vanguard of innovation to drive growth in digital assets and boost our economy,” Andrew Griffith, economic secretary to the Treasury, said in a statement.

Griffith added that he “will carefully consider” the commission’s findings and recommendations.

More For You

Pudgy Penguins: A New Blueprint for Tokenized Culture

Pudgy Title Image

Pudgy Penguins is building a multi-vertical consumer IP platform — combining phygital products, games, NFTs and PENGU to monetize culture at scale.

What to know:

Pudgy Penguins is emerging as one of the strongest NFT-native brands of this cycle, shifting from speculative “digital luxury goods” into a multi-vertical consumer IP platform. Its strategy is to acquire users through mainstream channels first; toys, retail partnerships and viral media, then onboard them into Web3 through games, NFTs and the PENGU token.

The ecosystem now spans phygital products (> $13M retail sales and >1M units sold), games and experiences (Pudgy Party surpassed 500k downloads in two weeks), and a widely distributed token (airdropped to 6M+ wallets). While the market is currently pricing Pudgy at a premium relative to traditional IP peers, sustained success depends on execution across retail expansion, gaming adoption and deeper token utility.

More For You

Crypto faces fork in the road as Clarity Act support wavers, Bitwise says

Bitwise Chief Investment Officer Matt Hougan

The asset manager argued that without federal legislation, the industry has three years to become indispensable before political winds potentially shift.

What to know:

  • Bitwise said in a blog post Monday that Polymarket odds for the Clarity Act have fallen from 80% to 50% following industry pushback.
  • If the bill fails, Bitwise believes crypto must achieve mass adoption in stablecoins and tokenization to force a regulatory hand.
  • The firm anticipates a sharp rally upon the bill's passage, while a failure would likely lead to a "slower ascent" tied to proven utility.