Share this article

New Singapore Crypto Law Requires Overseas-Only Operators to Be Licensed: Report

The city-state's Tuesday passage of the law means such companies will have to meet anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism measures, for which they were not previously regulated.

Updated May 11, 2023, 3:54 p.m. Published Apr 5, 2022, 7:12 a.m.

The Singapore Parliament passed a law on Tuesday that will require crypto businesses based in the city-state but only doing business overseas to be licensed, according to Bloomberg.

  • At the moment, Singapore's crypto entities are not regulated for anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism and thus the move is aimed at tightening rules for cryptocurrency providers.
  • Singapore is walking a tightrope of both welcoming Web 3 companies while issuing guidelines to limit crypto ads in public spaces and media.
  • The new rule is part of the Financial Services and Markets Bill. This bill includes the imposition of a higher maximum penalty of S$1 million (US$737,050) on financial institutions if they experience cyberattacks or their services are disrupted.
  • The bill gives greater powers to the Monetary Authority of Singapore to prohibit individuals who are deemed unfit from performing key roles, activities and functions in the financial industry. These will now include individuals providing payment services and conducting risk management.


STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the State of Crypto Newsletter today. See all newsletters



More For You

U.S. DOJ hits Paxful for $4 million in case tied to illegal sex work, money laundering

The U.S. Department of Justice grabbed another of the men it alleges moved billions in criminal money at BTC-e.  (Jesse Hamilton/CoinDesk)

The crypto platform's penalty was sharply reduced due to its ability to pay, according to U.S. authorities.

What to know:

  • The U.S. Department of Justice won a $4 million penalty from former crypto platform Paxful in a sentence tied to the dodging of money-laundering laws.
  • The amount was reduced from an original amount of $112 million by prosecutors after determining the business couldn't pay that much, the DOJ said.