Share this article

Uniswap User Loses $8M Worth of Ether in Phishing Attack

The attacker enticed users with a fake Uniswap airdrop message.

Updated May 11, 2023, 4:43 p.m. Published Jul 12, 2022, 11:56 a.m. 2 min read
jwp-player-placeholder

A Uniswap user lost over $8 million worth of ether (ETH) Tuesday in a phishing attack that saw the attacker deploy an airdrop bait to trick users, security researchers said.

According to tweets by MetaMask security researcher “harry.eth” on Monday night, some 73,399 wallet addresses connected to Uniswap were sent a malicious token masquerading as a uniswap (UNI) token airdrop based on their liquidity pool positions on Uniswap version 3.

Information in the malicious smart contract led to a website that imitated Uniswap domain branding.

The message claimed to airdrop UNI tokens to liquidity providers (LP) based on the number of fake LP tokens they received. Liquidity providers supply their assets on Uniswap in return for rewards.

Interacting with the phishing message, however, gave the underlying smart contract permission to transfer assets out of and gain full control of a user’s wallet.

One person, who was providing over $8 million worth of wrapped bitcoin (WBTC) and USD coin (USDC) to a WBTC/USDC liquidity pool, according to blockchain data, unknowingly interacted with the phishing message.

The attacker was able to gain control of the wallet, exit the LP’s positions and transfer the tokens to other wallets. Blockchain data further shows the attacker started to move stolen funds through privacy protocol Tornado Cash in early Asian hours Tuesday.

In the hours following the attack, Binance founder Changpeng Zhao alerted users to be aware of a possible exploit on Uniswap. This was however later corrected, as the exploit was limited to a phishing message and did not affect the Uniswap protocol, as Uniswap Labs CEO Hayden Adams confirmed in separate tweets.

More For You

XRP News

A draft XRPL amendment notes that flash loan attacks are "structurally impossible" on the network because of how its transactions are built, an architectural quirk that has spared the chain from the exploit class that has cost Ethereum DeFi billions.

What to know:

  • Recent DeFi exploits on protocols like Thorchain, Drift and KelpDAO have relied on flash loans, a mechanism that does not exist on the XRP Ledger.
  • Because XRPL transactions are atomic and cannot include composable intra-transaction calls, flash loan attacks are structurally impossible on the network.
  • As XRPL pursues AMM upgrades...