Avalanche Foundation Puts Rules on Plans to Buy Meme Coins
Only meme coins native to the Avalanche blockchain will be considered, according to new guidelines.

Not all meme coins are created equal. If they're to get bought up by the Avalanche Foundation, their creators will have to follow some rules.
The organization that supports the Avalanche blockchain released an "eligibility framework" Tuesday that puts some guardrails around its eyebrow-raising plan to start purchasing meme coins: those jokey, highly volatile cryptocurrencies that are often paired with dogs.
These tokens have become a big business with sometimes maddening returns in spite of their lack of value. But many of them are also outright scams meant to enrich their founders, who can create them quickly and cheaply atop permissionless blockchains where anyone can trade them.
No matter one's philosophical perspective on meme coins, the Avalanche Foundation has "already started" buying some using money from its $100 million "Culture Catalyst" fund for cultural initiatives, it said in a statement Tuesday.
The Foundation did not respond to questions regarding which tokens it had bought, how much capital it is earmarking for meme coins or whether it would actively manage its positions.
"The Foundation embraces the full spectrum of creativity, culture, and camaraderie in the blockchain space, and broadly views meme coins, NFTs, and similar tokens created by the community for culture and engagement as 'community coins,'" the statement shared with CoinDesk read.
Rules
Meme coins have to be independent from their creators and native to the Avalanche blockchain to be considered, according to the three-page rule set shared with CoinDesk. That means no tokens with allocations earmarked for their team or clones on other blockchains, and a creator team that renounced ownership of the mint contract.
Additionally, the Foundation won't look kindly upon tokens hoarded by whales, those that have not been scrutinized by security companies or those that launched without whitelists.
The rules are malleable, the foundation said, and simply meeting them will not guarantee they will be bought up. But there are some miminums they must meet as of January 2024:
- At least 2,000 holders, of whom the top 100 own less than 60% of supply
- More than $200,000 in liquidity supplied by at least 50 providers
- At least a $1 million market cap
- See at least $100,000 in daily average trading volume over two weeks
Finally, the meme coin needs to have existed for at least a month "in order to give the community time to get to know and understand the coin," the framework said.
More For You
Protocol Research: GoPlus Security

What to know:
- As of October 2025, GoPlus has generated $4.7M in total revenue across its product lines. The GoPlus App is the primary revenue driver, contributing $2.5M (approx. 53%), followed by the SafeToken Protocol at $1.7M.
- GoPlus Intelligence's Token Security API averaged 717 million monthly calls year-to-date in 2025 , with a peak of nearly 1 billion calls in February 2025. Total blockchain-level requests, including transaction simulations, averaged an additional 350 million per month.
- Since its January 2025 launch , the $GPS token has registered over $5B in total spot volume and $10B in derivatives volume in 2025. Monthly spot volume peaked in March 2025 at over $1.1B , while derivatives volume peaked the same month at over $4B.
More For You
IMF Flags Stablecoins as Source of Risk to Emerging Markets, Experts Say We Aren't There Yet

The IMF warns that USD-pegged stablecoins could undermine local currencies in emerging markets by facilitating currency substitution and capital outflows.
What to know:
- The IMF warns that USD-pegged stablecoins could undermine local currencies in emerging markets by facilitating currency substitution and capital outflows.
- Despite concerns, experts argue that the stablecoin market is still too small to have a significant macroeconomic impact.
- Stablecoins are primarily used for crypto trading, and their market size remains small compared to global currency flows.











