The CFTC Just Defined What 'Actual Delivery' of Crypto Should Look Like
The CFTC created formal guidance for when one party has “delivered” crypto assets to another, settling a long-standing question around the issue.

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) published its final guidance on "actual delivery for digital assets" Tuesday, seemingly settling a longstanding question on when a cryptocurrency can be "delivered" from one party to another.
The CFTC shared a 35-page document stating that in its view, "actual delivery" occurs when a customer has complete control over the asset and the offeror no longer has any control over the asset by the end of 28 days after the transaction. The publication comes following several years of public input from exchanges and other stakeholders.
The regulator approved the draft on March 23, according to the document.
How "actual delivery" is defined has long been an open question. In 2016, law firm Steptoe & Johnson LLP petitioned the CFTC after the federal commodities regulator settled charges with crypto exchange Bitfinex on trading violation allegations.
The charges stemmed from CFTC allegations that Bitfinex maintained control over cryptocurrency private keys after delivering funds tied to margin trading, and therefore the funds weren't actually delivered. The charges were settled, with Bitfinex paying $75,000.
Steptoe filed a petition shortly after, claiming the settlement did not provide any clarity to what "actual delivery" looked like. The petition argued that the definition of custody was unclear, which could be harmful to the crypto industry.
Tuesday's filing might settle some of this gray area.
"However, the Commission notes that it does not intend to create a bright line definition given the evolving nature of the commodity and, in some instances, its underlying public distributed ledger technology," today's document said.
CFTC Chairman Heath Tarbert said in a statement he does not believe the agency will conduct enforcement actions for the next 90 days around potential delivery violations to "prevent any potential market disruptions" as firms abide by the new guidance.
According to Tuesday's document, the CFTC defines "actual delivery" as having occurred when:
"(1) A customer secures: (i) possession and control of the entire quantity of the commodity, whether it was purchased on margin, or using leverage, or any other financing arrangement, and (ii) the ability to use the entire quantity of the commodity freely in commerce (away from any particular execution venue) no later than 28 days from the date of the transaction and at all times thereafter; and (2) The offeror and counterparty seller (including any of their respective affiliates or other persons acting in concert with the offeror or counterparty seller on a similar basis) do not retain any interest in, legal right, or control over any of the commodity purchased on margin, leverage, or other financing arrangement at the expiration of 28 days from the date of the transaction."
Read the full document below:
More For You
Protocol Research: GoPlus Security

What to know:
- As of October 2025, GoPlus has generated $4.7M in total revenue across its product lines. The GoPlus App is the primary revenue driver, contributing $2.5M (approx. 53%), followed by the SafeToken Protocol at $1.7M.
- GoPlus Intelligence's Token Security API averaged 717 million monthly calls year-to-date in 2025 , with a peak of nearly 1 billion calls in February 2025. Total blockchain-level requests, including transaction simulations, averaged an additional 350 million per month.
- Since its January 2025 launch , the $GPS token has registered over $5B in total spot volume and $10B in derivatives volume in 2025. Monthly spot volume peaked in March 2025 at over $1.1B , while derivatives volume peaked the same month at over $4B.
More For You
XRP Faces Downside Risk as Social Sentiment Turns Wildly Negative

The turn in crowd mood comes after a two-month slide of roughly 31%, leaving the token vulnerable to further downside if risk appetite weakens across majors.
What to know:
- XRP's price approached the $2 mark as social sentiment around the token turned sharply negative, according to Santiment data.
- The token has experienced a 31% decline over two months, making it vulnerable to further losses if market risk appetite weakens.
- Santiment's sentiment model indicates XRP is in a 'fear zone,' where negative commentary significantly outweighs positive talk, potentially influencing market positioning.











