Share this article
Jefferies CEO Expressed Doubts About Sam Bankman-Fried in July
Rich Handler, a restructuring expert, said SBF was "over his head" in trying to rescue crypto outfits.
By Brandy Betz
Updated May 9, 2023, 4:02 a.m. Published Nov 10, 2022, 2:49 p.m.
Make us preferred on Google
Even as he was being feted by some as this generation's J.P. Morgan – who essentially was a one-man central bank before the Federal Reserve ever came into being, Sam Bankman-Fried's attempts to be the lender of last resort to crumbling crypto companies raised concerns from at least one highly experienced traditional financier.
"He seems in over his head," Jefferies Financial Group (JEF) CEO Richard Handler emailed to an associate on July 7. "Our expertise in rescuing financial services companies might make it worthwhile to meet [with] him and begin a relationship. Just a thought.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the Crypto Daybook Americas Newsletter today. See all newsletters
“What he is going through is not going to pass as quickly as he might wish and you can quickly become the rescuee versus the rescuer if you’re not careful,” Handler continued.
Experienced at restructuring, Handler has worked for Jefferies for 32 years and has been its CEO for the last 22 years. He has helped bail out financial-services firm Knight Capital and retail currency brokerage FXCM.
Further emails posted by Handler revealed that Bankman-Fried never responded to his repeated entreaties for a meeting.
Handler ends his Twitter thread with a numbered list of conclusions. Two notable ones: “Just like a broken clock, even a Boomer can also be right sometimes," and "Arrogance and hubris destroys everything, every time."
Read more: Why Is Crypto Tanking: The FTX-Binance Drama Explained
Mais para você
Specialized AI detects 92% of real-world DeFi exploits
New research claims specialized AI dramatically outperforms general-purpose models at detecting exploited DeFi vulnerabilities.
O que saber:
- A purpose-built AI security agent detected vulnerabilities in 92% of 90 exploited DeFi contracts ($96.8 million in exploit value), compared with 34% and $7.5 million for a baseline GPT-5.1-based coding agent running on the same underlying model.
- The gap came from domain-specific security methodology layered on top of the model, not differences in core AI capability, according to the report.
- The findings come as prior research from Anthropic and OpenAI shows AI agents can execute end-to-end smart contract exploits at low cost, accelerating concerns that offensive AI capabilities are scaling faster than defensive adoption.
Top Stories
