SEC Hints at Tether Probe in Records Request Denial
The U.S. regulator cited a law enforcement exemption in denying a Freedom of Information Act request about Tether, though this doesn’t necessarily mean any charges will be filed.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) may be investigating Tether and Tether Operations Limited, a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request found.
The SEC said it would not release records around Tether because they were collected for enforcement purposes, according to a FOIA response the SEC sent to The New Republic staff writer Jacob Silverman.
“We are withholding records that may be responsive to your request under 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(A). This exemption protects from disclosure records compiled for law enforcement purposes, the release of which could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement activities,” the response said.
The SEC response also said the withholding of records for the law enforcement exemption does not necessarily mean any charges or enforcement actions will be brought.
In a statement from an external spokesperson, Tether said, “We constantly work with regulators and law enforcement around the world and we collaborate on many aspects regarding the broader digital asset industry. We therefore caution anyone from jumping to false conclusions about matters related to Tether.”
SIlverman’s original request, filed on Aug. 31, 2021, asked for “all documents, emails, memos and reports” that mentioned or otherwise dealt with Tether and Tether Operations Limited.
He told CoinDesk he was “pretty suspicious” about Tether, leading to his filing multiple FOIA requests with the SEC (one for each entity name).
“Like a lot of people I’m researching the space, and like a lot of people I was curious [about] what is the deal with Tether and the various controversies,” he said.
Any SEC investigation would have to have started recently. According to Bennett Tomlin, a data scientist, a similar FOIA request filed in February and returned in July found the SEC did not “locate or identify any information responsive to your request.”
The SEC is not the only agency to have refused FOIA requests involving Tether. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) refused a similar request in 2018 about subpoenas issued to the company on similar grounds.
Tether is also fighting an open records request in the New York state courts. CoinDesk filed a Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) request for information about Tether’s reserves earlier this summer.
The company pushed back at the end of August, arguing that some of the information that would be published should remain confidential due to concerns about competition with other stablecoins.
“Tether’s competitive advantage, and the area of highest competition between stablecoin platforms, lies not in the operational features of the tether token itself but rather in the liquidity of the tokens in the marketplace, Tether’s presence on multiple blockchains, and the stability, reliability, and profitability of Tether as an entity,” Tether’s petition said.
UPDATE (Sept. 24, 2021, 18:40 UTC): Adds FOIA response received by Bennett Tomlin, adds Tether statement.
More For You
Pudgy Penguins: A New Blueprint for Tokenized Culture

Pudgy Penguins is building a multi-vertical consumer IP platform — combining phygital products, games, NFTs and PENGU to monetize culture at scale.
What to know:
Pudgy Penguins is emerging as one of the strongest NFT-native brands of this cycle, shifting from speculative “digital luxury goods” into a multi-vertical consumer IP platform. Its strategy is to acquire users through mainstream channels first; toys, retail partnerships and viral media, then onboard them into Web3 through games, NFTs and the PENGU token.
The ecosystem now spans phygital products (> $13M retail sales and >1M units sold), games and experiences (Pudgy Party surpassed 500k downloads in two weeks), and a widely distributed token (airdropped to 6M+ wallets). While the market is currently pricing Pudgy at a premium relative to traditional IP peers, sustained success depends on execution across retail expansion, gaming adoption and deeper token utility.
More For You
SEC clarifies rules for tokenized stocks, tightening scrutiny on synthetic equity

The agency says issuer approval is required for true tokenized ownership, warning that many stock tokens sold to retail investors provide only indirect or synthetic exposure.
What to know:
- The Securities and Exchange Commission issued new guidance clarifying that tokenized stocks are subject to existing securities and derivatives rules, regardless of whether they are recorded on a blockchain.
- The agency drew a sharp line between issuer-sponsored tokenized securities, which can represent true equity ownership, and third-party products that typically provide only synthetic exposure or custodial entitlements.
- Regulators signaled they aim to curb the spread of synthetic equity products to retail investors while encouraging issuer-approved, fully regulated tokenization structures.









