Coinbase to Propose Crypto Regulations to US Officials: Sources
Coinbase is said to be working on a pitch to federal regulators on how to oversee the crypto industry.

Crypto exchange Coinbase is preparing to pitch a proposed regulatory framework to federal officials.
The exchange plans to publicly roll out this proposal in the coming days, according to sources familiar with the regulatory discussions. Details of the proposal were not available at press time, but among other matters the company intends to argue what should and should not be defined as a security within the U.S.
When reached by CoinDesk, a Coinbase spokesperson declined to comment.
The news comes after Coinbase announced it was ceasing plans to offer a crypto lending product, which the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) said would violate securities laws.
Earlier this month, Coinbase Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal and CEO Brian Armstrong revealed that the SEC had sent a Wells Notice to the exchange, which said the regulator would sue Coinbase should its “Lend” product launch.
Read more: Coinbase Drops Planned ‘Lend’ Program After SEC Warning
The SEC cited two U.S. Supreme Court precedents – the Howey and Reves cases – in arguing that Lend appeared to violate securities laws.
While Coinbase did not publish the Wells Notice, legal experts told CoinDesk the regulator might be comparing Lend to stocks or certificates of interest, which are securities under the SEC’s purview.
Setting precedent
Coinbase has a long history of trying to create frameworks and tools to standardize how exchanges approach crypto listings and products, at least within the U.S.
The exchange was a founding member of the Crypto Rating Council, a 2019 effort that sought to create a common understanding of how closely any given cryptocurrency resembled a security.
The group rated a cryptocurrency from between 1 and 5, with a 1 referring to something that is definitely not a security (such as bitcoin), and a 5 referring to something that did appear to be a security (the CRC has not announced any cryptocurrencies that fit that description).
The CRC published its approach and a scorecard that projects could use for self-evaluation last year.
Coinbase also published an open-source technical framework last year for crypto developers. Projects that adopted the framework could ensure their cryptocurrencies would be compatible with Coinbase’s listing and trading technical back end, should the exchange approve these cryptocurrencies for its platform.
More For You
Pudgy Penguins: A New Blueprint for Tokenized Culture

Pudgy Penguins is building a multi-vertical consumer IP platform — combining phygital products, games, NFTs and PENGU to monetize culture at scale.
What to know:
Pudgy Penguins is emerging as one of the strongest NFT-native brands of this cycle, shifting from speculative “digital luxury goods” into a multi-vertical consumer IP platform. Its strategy is to acquire users through mainstream channels first; toys, retail partnerships and viral media, then onboard them into Web3 through games, NFTs and the PENGU token.
The ecosystem now spans phygital products (> $13M retail sales and >1M units sold), games and experiences (Pudgy Party surpassed 500k downloads in two weeks), and a widely distributed token (airdropped to 6M+ wallets). While the market is currently pricing Pudgy at a premium relative to traditional IP peers, sustained success depends on execution across retail expansion, gaming adoption and deeper token utility.
More For You
Crypto faces fork in the road as Clarity Act support wavers, Bitwise says

The asset manager argued that without federal legislation, the industry has three years to become indispensable before political winds potentially shift.
What to know:
- Bitwise said in a blog post Monday that Polymarket odds for the Clarity Act have fallen from 80% to 50% following industry pushback.
- If the bill fails, Bitwise believes crypto must achieve mass adoption in stablecoins and tokenization to force a regulatory hand.
- The firm anticipates a sharp rally upon the bill's passage, while a failure would likely lead to a "slower ascent" tied to proven utility.









