Share this article
Making Sense of the SEC's Case Against Telegram
Telegram lost another round in court against the SEC and now can’t launch its $1.7 billion token sale. What does it mean for the crypto industry and other startups that sold tokens?
Updated Dec 10, 2022, 3:18 p.m. Published Apr 12, 2020, 2:00 p.m.
Make us preferred on Google
Telegram lost another round in court against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and now can’t issue the tokens sold during its $1.7 billion fundraising campaign. What does it mean for the crypto industry and other startups that sold tokens?
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the Crypto Daybook Americas Newsletter today. See all newsletters
Listen/subscribe to the CoinDesk Podcast feed for unique perspectives and fresh daily insight with Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Pocketcasts, Google Podcasts, Castbox, Stitcher, RadioPublica, IHeartRadio or RSS.
Telegram, the popular messaging app, has big plans for its blockchain Telegram Open Network, or TON. It also had one of the biggest token sales in history, followed by a huge legal fight over it.
The SEC sued the company to halt the TON network, saying its native gram tokens were unregistered securities. Telegram argued grams were a commodity. A federal judge in New York issued a preliminary injunction agreeing with the SEC, blocking Telegram from issuing tokens.
The court battle has been an interesting one, as is the ruling of the judge.
Together with two experienced attorneys, Gabriel Shapiro of BSV Law and Phillip Moustakis of Seward & Kissel, we’re unpacking this process, which is likely to set a precedent for other token sales structured as SAFTs, or simple agreements for future tokens – starting with Kik and potentially followed by many more.
- SAFTs used to be a popular form of fundraising in crypto. What went wrong for Telegram?
- Is there still a chance an ambitious proof-of-stake blockchainhttps://test.ton.org/ will still get launched?
- Is there a safe way to raise money via a token sale or not?
- What are the remaining options for Telegram – and for its investors?
See also:
Judge Halts Telegram Token Issuance in Injunction Requested by SEC
Telegram Hopes It Can Still Sell Tokens to Non-US Investors After Court Ruling
Blockchain Association Says Court ‘Erred’ With Decision to Block Telegram’s Token Issuance
Digital Chamber Asks Court to Draw Line Between Investment Contracts and Assets in Telegram Case
Andreessen Horowitz: “Reading Between the Lines: SEC, Telegram, and Rule 144”
SEC Settles Securities Registration Charges Against 2 ICO Startups
More For You
Bithumb admits to ‘serious flaws’ that left internal systems vulnerable to potential sabotage
The South Korean crypto exchange’s CEO Le Jae-won said the lack of proper controls led to the erroneous transfer of bitcoin worth more than $40 billion to customers. Most has been recovered.
What to know:
- Bithumb admitted that serious internal system flaws led it to mistakenly transfer about $40 billion in bitcoin to customers instead of a planned payout of roughly $428.
- The error briefly caused bitcoin prices on Bithumb to plunge 17 percent, prompted a probe by South Korea's Financial Supervisory Service and exposed gaps in the exchange's asset-matching and account-segregation controls.
- While Bithumb has recovered most of the coins, 1,786 bitcoins sold before accounts were frozen remain missing, intensifying lawmakers' concerns about weak oversight in one of the world's busiest crypto markets.
Top Stories
