Share this article

ETH Whale Pays $5.2M in Fees for 2 Mysterious Transfers Totaling $82K [Updated]

Over the past two days, an unknown wallet holder has paid some $5.2 million in transaction fees for two ether transactions.

Updated Sep 14, 2021, 8:50 a.m. Published Jun 10, 2020, 12:25 p.m.
Credit: Shutterstock/Rainer_81
Credit: Shutterstock/Rainer_81

Slip of the finger? Masochist? It's not yet known. But over the past two days, an unknown wallet holder has paid some $5.2 million in transaction fees for two ether transactions.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the Crypto Daybook Americas Newsletter today. See all newsletters

Just before 10:00 UTC Wednesday, an unknown wallet holder sent 0.55 ether (around $133) with a 10,666 ETH transaction fee – currently worth just under $2.6 million.

The fee went to Chinese mining group Spark Pool, which processed the transaction and may distribute the millions to its members. A normal transaction fee would likely be up to $0.50 or so, but can be manually set higher by a sender if they want to push a transaction through more quickly.

Around 4:00 UTC Thursday, the same address sent out another 350 ether with another 10,668 ETH – worth $2.6 million – in transaction fees. The block was mined by the Ethermine pool.

The identities of both the sender and receiver are not yet known. But the sender has an ETH wallet balance worth more than $11 million – even after spending $2.6 million in transaction fees. In comparison, the receiver's wallet is now empty, with past funds transferred out to other wallets.

Strangely, the sender's wallet has been sending out transactions every minute in recent hours and with attached fees worth less than a dollar. As such, it's possible the whale accidentally reversed the figures for this odd transaction.

See also: Bitcoin Transaction Fees Decline as Network Congestion Eases

This isn't the first time Spark Pool has been on the receiving end of a transaction fee windfall.

Last year, the company froze a mysterious 2,100 ETH payment (then worth $300,000) it made for mining just one block – 600 times the average block reward at the time. After tracking down the sender, a South Korean blockchain firm, Spark Pool agreed to split the reward 50/50.

Regarding this latest transaction, a Spark Pool spokesperson told CoinDesk it was following up and welcomed any potential leads about the identity of the sender just "in case it was sent by mistake."

Following the publication of this article on June 10, the spokesperson said it had frozen the payout to miners in its pool.

UPDATE (June 11, 2020: 18:17 UTC): This article has been updated with news of a second transfer from the same address, with another transaction fee worth $2.6 million.

Больше для вас

'We do not do illegal things': Inside a U.S.-sanctioned stablecoin issuer's race to build a crypto giant

Oleg Ogienko, director for regulatory and overseas affairs at A7A5, at Consensus in Hong Kong (provided)

Oleg Ogienko, the public face of A7A5, pitched the ruble-pegged stablecoin as a fast-growing trade rail built to move money across borders despite sanctions pressure.

Что нужно знать:

  • Oleg Ogienko, the public face of ruble-denominated stablecoin issuer A7A5, insists the firm complies fully with Kyrgyz regulations and international anti-money-laundering standards despite extensive U.S. sanctions on its affiliates.
  • A7A5, whose issuing entities and reserve bank are sanctioned by the U.S. Treasury, has grown faster than USDT and USDC and aims to handle more than 20 percent of Russia’s trade settlements, primarily serving businesses in Asia, Africa and South America trading with Russian partners.
  • Ogienko said that he and his team were developing partnerships with blockchain platforms and exchanges during Consensus in Hong Kong, though declined to name specifics.