Share this article

Bitcoin Lender BTCJam Reports No Customer Funds Lost in Hack

P2P bitcoin lending startup BTCJam has said no funds were lost after a security breach at its mail provider.

Updated Sep 11, 2021, 11:03 a.m. Published Aug 12, 2014, 11:23 p.m.
online security

BTCJam has suffered an apparent security breach that affected an unknown number of users.

The peer-to-peer lender was quick to reassure its clients that no bitcoins had been lost from their accounts. A spokesperson said the incident was the result of a hack at its email provider, which allowed the attacker to access funds belonging to customers with low security settings.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the Crypto Daybook Americas Newsletter today. See all newsletters

BTCJam

started experiencing some issues over the weekend and was offline on Sunday.

We are offline to resolve some technical issues with logging in. We would like to assure you that no Bitcions were lost in this process.





— BTCJam (@btcjam) August 10, 2014

BTCJam reassures users

The latest issue was reported by a BTCJam user on Reddit. The user said the site was down and support had not yet responded to requests for assistance.

Chief product officer Gustavo Guida responded to the thread saying the company was working to get its services back up.

“The majority of our coins are in our cold storage and no users will lose any bitcoins at all,” he added.

Guida said BTCJam is investigating the issue. A few hours later it was up and running again; Guida apologised for the downtime.

The company later posted on its public blog:

"A recent hack at our email provider Mailjet allowed a hacker to gain access to some of the transactional emails of BTCJam for a period of two hours. Through this, he was able to initiate unauthorized transactions from a small amount of users who did not have Two Factor Authentication enabled.





The problem is now solved and no users have lost any bitcoins as a result of this."

The article added that as a security measure, the lender would move the most critical transactional emails to its own server and strongly encouraged users to enable two-factor authentication.

Investigating the situation

Shortly after services were restored, Guida said the company managed to identify just “a few” invalid transactions.

“We are finishing our investigations and will reinstate the affected accounts back to the previous state so no bitcoins will be lost at all,” he said.

In the meantime other users reported downtime and suspicious transactions, but for the time being it appears this was a minor issue which did not cause any significant disruptions or losses.

BTCJam is a startup based in San Francisco with the goal to bring peer-to-peer lending to a global audience. Using bitcoin allows BTCJam to approve loans and transfer the funds almost instantly regardless of location. The concept can also be used to provide quick loans to unbanked people in developing regions.

Image via Shutterstock

Higit pang Para sa Iyo

Protocol Research: GoPlus Security

GP Basic Image

Ano ang dapat malaman:

  • As of October 2025, GoPlus has generated $4.7M in total revenue across its product lines. The GoPlus App is the primary revenue driver, contributing $2.5M (approx. 53%), followed by the SafeToken Protocol at $1.7M.
  • GoPlus Intelligence's Token Security API averaged 717 million monthly calls year-to-date in 2025 , with a peak of nearly 1 billion calls in February 2025. Total blockchain-level requests, including transaction simulations, averaged an additional 350 million per month.
  • Since its January 2025 launch , the $GPS token has registered over $5B in total spot volume and $10B in derivatives volume in 2025. Monthly spot volume peaked in March 2025 at over $1.1B , while derivatives volume peaked the same month at over $4B.

Higit pang Para sa Iyo

Tom Lee responds to controversy surrounding Fundstrat’s differing bitcoin outlooks

Fundstrat Global Advisors Head of Research Tom Lee (Photo by Ilya S. Savenok / Getty Images for BitMine)

A debate on X over seemingly conflicting bitcoin forecasts from Fundstrat analysts drew a response from Tom Lee, highlighting differing mandates and time horizons.

Ano ang dapat malaman:

  • X users flagged what appeared to be conflicting bitcoin outlooks from Fundstrat’s Tom Lee and Sean Farrell.
  • Lee endorsed a post arguing the views reflect different mandates and time horizons, not internal disagreement.
  • The episode highlights how public commentary can blur distinctions between short-term risk management and long-term macro views.