Share this article

‘Wrong’ to Regulate Crypto Through Enforcement: Ex-CFTC Official Quintenz

Brian Quintenz joined CoinDesk TV to discuss the current regulatory environment.

Updated May 11, 2023, 7:02 p.m. Published Sep 10, 2021, 5:02 p.m.
Former CFTC official Brian Quintenz (CoinDesk TV archives)
Former CFTC official Brian Quintenz (CoinDesk TV archives)

Yet another former Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) official has said that setting regulation through enforcement is the wrong approach for the burgeoning cryptocurrency industry.

In an appearance on CoinDesk TV’s “First Mover” Friday, Brian Quintenz, who left the commodities watchdog just weeks ago and announced Thursday he has joined venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) as a part-time adviser, commented on the current regulatory action happening in the U.S. This includes the news another agency, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), has threatened to sue Coinbase over a proposed lending product.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the Crypto Daybook Americas Newsletter today. See all newsletters

Deflating claims that the CFTC and its sister agency are engaged in a turf war, Quintenz said the federal agencies must work closely together to establish a comprehensive cryptocurrency framework.

jwp-player-placeholder

“I don’t necessarily think applying 80-year-old laws to these kinds of dynamics are really the best way that the government can promote innovation, wealth creation and access to financial inclusion,” he said.

Quintenz is the latest former or current regulator to call for updating regulations. Policymakers are working to make sense of the crypto industry that, by design, overturns many established financial principles. This means fitting new tools into old paradigms, issuing guidance and, as what Quintenz hopes would be a last resort, establishing precedent through lawsuits.

In Coinbase’s case, the publicly traded exchange was reportedly in a dialogue with the SEC for months over what it was promoting as a savings account – offering 4% yields on USDC stablecoin deposits held with the exchange – before the agency threatened to sue. To the SEC the yet-to-be launched product looks more like a bond and thus a security, which is the regulator’s domain.

Read more: Giancarlo on Coinbase-SEC Clash: ‘Don’t Apply 90-Year-Old Statutes’

“Are those the laws that we would create now in response to any issues or problems or dynamics that currently exist? I would probably say no,” Quintenz said. He added that he is not a securities lawyer and does not know the particulars of the Coinbase case.

“We put forward guidance to try to provide clarity before we took an enforcement approach ... that’s the right way to look at innovation,” he said. “Setting policy through enforcement, in my view, is wrong.”

Guidance tells people what they can do, making it easier for them to know how to launch something compliantly, whereas enforcement only tells people what they cannot do, which does not help them be proactive about complying.

Sibling rivalry?

With the SEC having a crypto expert at the helm for the past few months, it appears the SEC and CFTC are fighting over turf. Last month, SEC Chair Gary Gensler stated that the vast majority of crypto assets would likely fall under the purview of his agency. Currently, only bitcoin and ether are decidedly commodities.

But Quintenz stressed the U.S. agencies have been working together for the benefit of the crypto industry and noted the personal relationships he forged with former SEC chief Joseph “Jay” Clayton and current Commissioner Hester Pierce.

“We’ve worked very constructively together to try to understand the innovation that was occurring in this space,” he said.

It’s up to incoming staff at the CFTC – there are now three senior vacancies for Congress to fill, Quintenz noted – to keep up this “coordination, communication and relationship” between the agencies and determine where their jurisdictions “overlap.”

More For You

Pudgy Penguins: A New Blueprint for Tokenized Culture

Pudgy Title Image

Pudgy Penguins is building a multi-vertical consumer IP platform — combining phygital products, games, NFTs and PENGU to monetize culture at scale.

What to know:

Pudgy Penguins is emerging as one of the strongest NFT-native brands of this cycle, shifting from speculative “digital luxury goods” into a multi-vertical consumer IP platform. Its strategy is to acquire users through mainstream channels first; toys, retail partnerships and viral media, then onboard them into Web3 through games, NFTs and the PENGU token.

The ecosystem now spans phygital products (> $13M retail sales and >1M units sold), games and experiences (Pudgy Party surpassed 500k downloads in two weeks), and a widely distributed token (airdropped to 6M+ wallets). While the market is currently pricing Pudgy at a premium relative to traditional IP peers, sustained success depends on execution across retail expansion, gaming adoption and deeper token utility.

More For You

Circle faces first major 'threat' for institutional dollars from Tether’s USAT

Circle logo on a building

While Circle's USDC has operated without a "credible domestic competitor," Tether's USAT has the potential to shake up the landscape, analysts said.

What to know:

  • Analysts said USAT, the U.S.-focused stablecoin by Tether, could become the first credible domestic competitor to Circle's USDC token.
  • USAT is "a threat to USDC" and could gain an edge through institutional partners and global USDT connectivity, Crypto is Macro Now's Noelle Acheson said.
  • ClearStreet's Owen Lau called USAT “a manageable risk” for Circle, and noted potential "cannibalization" risk between Tether's two tokens.